On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com
wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Why a and not d (developer)? Seems to me that would cover the needed
permissions to manager the Astrix and AstLinux conf files.
I meant 'v', not
On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:40 AM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com
wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Why a and not d (developer)? Seems to me that would cover the needed
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com
wrote:
Fossil hit our radar, and we wondered if it could be used to track changes
to these configuration files in a way a non-developer type could easily
understand.
Long story short, success, Fossil is a gem !
Good
Hi Ron,
On Aug 27, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Since any HTTPS access to /admin/fossil/ is authenticated by lighttpd, we set
Fossil's nobody permissions to a (admin) and add the admin user for s
(setup) permissions.
Why a and not d (developer)? Seems to me that
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com wrote:
we wondered if it could be used to track changes to these configuration files
in a way a non-developer type could easily understand.
Did you look at etckeeper, and if so, why did you reject it?
Hi Warren,
On Aug 26, 2015, at 5:28 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Aug 26, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck li...@lonnie.abelbeck.com
wrote:
we wondered if it could be used to track changes to these configuration
files in a way a non-developer type could easily understand.
6 matches
Mail list logo
