On 2/22/2013 14:09, Warren Young wrote:
"trunk" would be a good
default if Fossil had a "training wheels" mode for newbies like me, but
I can't seriously propose that as a feature.
Thinking more about it, this is really a Subversion issue. Unlike Git
and Fossil, svn lets you create a branch
On 2/21/2013 02:03, Martijn Coppoolse wrote:
This sounds as if the 'Files' tab of your repository links to
http:dir?ci=tip
whereas you expected it to link to
http:dir?ci=trunk
Yep, you've nailed it.
"tip" is the out-of-the-box default on a fresh repo, and seems to be a
sensib
On 20-2-2013 22:34, Warren Young wrote:
But before looking at it, I want to stress that I don't believe Fossil
has lost any data, it's just that the default Files view shows the last
branch I worked on, rather than the trunk as I expected.
This sounds as if the 'Files' tab of your repository li
On 2/20/2013 14:25, Richard Hipp wrote:
If you will send me the output of "git fast-export -all"
It's below.
But before looking at it, I want to stress that I don't believe Fossil
has lost any data, it's just that the default Files view shows the last
branch I worked on, rather than the trun
On 2/20/2013 13:30, Themba Fletcher wrote:
Does the following help in your case?
tif@:~$ fossil help settings | grep main-branch
main-branch The primary branch for the project. Default: trunk
No, sorry.
It makes sense that it doesn't help. If I open the minimal testcase
repositor
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On 2/19/2013 21:07, Warren Young wrote:
>
>>
>> We eventually figured out that Fossil was getting confused by the fact
>> that the last svn checkin was on a branch instead of the trunk, and that
>> branch held the file subset we saw in the Fo
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>
> The request, of course, is for the Fossil Git importer to either have some
> improvement that makes it smarter about recognizing the *true* trunk, or at
> least a flag that lets you tell it the trunk's tag name if it guesses wrong.
>
Doe
I'm currently working through the conversion of a 14 year old (!) svn
repo to Fossil, and ran into dodgy behavior in one of the iterations.
Over the years, we've changed how we named branches and tags a few
times. We had a mess like this:
mms5_00
mms6.3
mms-7.0
mms-v8
Dash o
8 matches
Mail list logo
