[fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Richard Hipp
Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for convenient
download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for details
including a summary of changes since the previous release.

Please let me know if you encounter any problems with this release. Thanks.

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:29:14 -0500 Richard Hipp wrote:

 Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for
 convenient download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for
 details including a summary of changes since the previous release.

On this page, the link See the Change Log for additional details
leads to the previous version of changes.wiki. The correct one is:

http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/489c67ae46/www/changes.wiki


-- 
Dmitry Chestnykh
http://www.codingrobots.com
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Tomek Kott
With the new TCL integration, does that mean that full TCL support is
available through the server end as well? That is, currently we can use TH1
variables etc. when setting up the displays, tickets, etc. through the web
interface. With TCL enabled, can we now replace the TH1 with TCL?

Thanks,

Tomek

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Dmitry Chestnykh
dmi...@codingrobots.comwrote:

 On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:29:14 -0500 Richard Hipp wrote:

  Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for
  convenient download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for
  details including a summary of changes since the previous release.

 On this page, the link See the Change Log for additional details
 leads to the previous version of changes.wiki. The correct one is:

 http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/489c67ae46/www/changes.wiki


 --
 Dmitry Chestnykh
 http://www.codingrobots.com
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 09:29:14AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
 Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for convenient
 download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for details
 including a summary of changes since the previous release.

Mentioned on @CopyfreeNews:

http://twitter.com/#!/CopyfreeNews/status/146632792241995776

Point of curiosity: Is there a Twitter feed for Fossil?
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote:


 Point of curiosity: Is there a Twitter feed for Fossil?


I was thinking the other day that it might be cool to have a feature
whereby a Fossil server would tweet every time it got a new check-in or
ticket or wiki edit, etc.  Any volunteers to contribute code?

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:56:42 -0500
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

 Point of curiosity: Is there a Twitter feed for Fossil?
 
 I was thinking the other day that it might be cool to have a feature
 whereby a Fossil server would tweet every time it got a new check-in
 or ticket or wiki edit, etc.  Any volunteers to contribute code?
Why tweet?  This is a proprietary service for little girls and
housewives.  Providing an RSS feed on relevant pages (timeline, namely)
would be just right (some wiki engines do this for their changes page
for instance).
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Jeremy Cowgar

There is already an RSS feed, project.org/timeline.rss.

As for Twitter being for little girls and housewives, millions of people 
disagree :-)


Jeremy

-Original Message- 
From: Konstantin Khomoutov

Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:12 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:56:42 -0500
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:


Point of curiosity: Is there a Twitter feed for Fossil?


I was thinking the other day that it might be cool to have a feature
whereby a Fossil server would tweet every time it got a new check-in
or ticket or wiki edit, etc.  Any volunteers to contribute code?

Why tweet?  This is a proprietary service for little girls and
housewives.  Providing an RSS feed on relevant pages (timeline, namely)
would be just right (some wiki engines do this for their changes page
for instance).
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users 


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Nolan Darilek

Not to beat a dead horse, but this seems like a great use for hooks.

I'd rather Fossil ping a CI server like Jenkins rather than tweet when a 
change gets made.



On 12/13/2011 10:56 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net 
mailto:c...@apotheon.net wrote:



Point of curiosity: Is there a Twitter feed for Fossil?


I was thinking the other day that it might be cool to have a feature 
whereby a Fossil server would tweet every time it got a new check-in 
or ticket or wiki edit, etc.  Any volunteers to contribute code?


--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org mailto:d...@sqlite.org


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Ben Summers b...@fluffy.co.uk wrote:

 That sounds like a post-commit hook to me.


FYIW: this type of post-commit hook could be implemented on top of the JSON
API, with the caveat that there would be a delay - the hook would have to
poll and store enough state to be able to decide whether a given commit is
new or not.

-- 
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Matt Welland
The changes include: Stop showing the server-code in status outputs - it
is no longer used for anything.

I've been using the server code extracted with fossil info to uniquely
identify repos. Is there a new way? I assume that the server code itself
continues to exist?

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

 Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for
 convenient download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for
 details including a summary of changes since the previous release.

 Please let me know if you encounter any problems with this release. Thanks.

 --
 D. Richard Hipp
 d...@sqlite.org

 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:

 The changes include: Stop showing the server-code in status outputs - it
 is no longer used for anything.

 I've been using the server code extracted with fossil info to uniquely
 identify repos. Is there a new way? I assume that the server code itself
 continues to exist?


The server-code is still there. It just isn't used for anything.

Perhaps you want the project-code, which is unique for a project.  All
servers that sync against that project share the same project-code, but
different projects have different codes.

The project code for Fossil itself is
CE59BB9F186226D80E49D1FA2DB29F935CCA0333 and all of the Fossil mirrors know
that.  SQLite, on the other hand uses a project code of
2ab58778c2967968b94284e989e43dc11791f548 which is different.  That way, you
cannot accidently sync a Fossil repo with an SQLite repo.



 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

  Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for
 convenient download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for
 details including a summary of changes since the previous release.

 Please let me know if you encounter any problems with this release.
 Thanks.

 --
 D. Richard Hipp
 d...@sqlite.org

 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users



 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users




-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Carlo Miron
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 15:29, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
 Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for convenient
 download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for details including
 a summary of changes since the previous release.
 Please let me know if you encounter any problems with this release. Thanks.

Out of curiosity: why is the Linux executable (and only that) over
than doubled in size?
Is it more statically linked than the other binaries?

Thanks,
©
-- 
Carlo Miron
Open Source Solution Architect
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Richard Hipp
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Carlo Miron ca...@miron.it wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 15:29, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
  Fossil version 1.21 has been packaged and put on the website for
 convenient
  download.  See http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html for details
 including
  a summary of changes since the previous release.
  Please let me know if you encounter any problems with this release.
 Thanks.

 Out of curiosity: why is the Linux executable (and only that) over
 than doubled in size?
 Is it more statically linked than the other binaries?


Right.  The linux binary is statically linked.  The others all use system
libraries (which we can better get away with because there is more
consistency about which libraries are available on non-linux systems.)




 Thanks,
 ©
 --
 Carlo Miron
 Open Source Solution Architect
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users




-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] Fossil version 1.21

2011-12-13 Thread Joe Mistachkin

Tomek Kott wrote:

 With the new TCL integration, does that mean that full TCL support is
available through the server end as well?


Yes.


 That is, currently we can use TH1 variables etc. when setting up the
displays, tickets, etc. through the web interface.
 With TCL enabled, can we now replace the TH1 with TCL?


The Tcl language does not replace TH1, it augments it.  For example, when
Tcl support is enabled at compile-time and
runtime (via the new tcl setting), you can use the [tclEval], [tclExpr],
and [tclInvoke] commands to allow complete
access to Tcl from TH1.  Similarly, the created Tcl interpreter will contain
the [th1Eval] and [th1Expr] commands to
allow Tcl script access to the Fossil-specific functionality already exposed
to TH1.

The Tcl integration was done in this way to maintain maximum compatibility
with previous versions and to allow people to
stick with using TH1 if they feel that Tcl is too 'heavy' for their
environment.

Here is a quick example TH1 script taken from the tests for the new Tcl
integration feature:

  tclInvoke set repository_name [repository 1]
  proc doOut {msg} {puts $msg; puts \n}
  doOut [tclEval {
package require sqlite3
sqlite3 db $repository_name
set x [db eval {SELECT COUNT(*) FROM user;}]
db close
return $x
  }]

--
Joe Mistachkin

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users