Re: [fossil-users] FossilFS. Was: libfossil + fuse

2014-04-25 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-04-25 0:45 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com: Then call it through pointers obtained from dlopen() and dlsym(). Now have fun making that portable. :^) No problem. The relation with libtcl85.so/libtcl86.so (or tcl85.dll/tcl86.dll on windows) is already done this way, therefore

[fossil-users] FossilFS. Was: libfossil + fuse

2014-04-24 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: What I most look forward to in libfossil is the potential to expose a repository, including all its yummy history, into a Unix filesystem. I don't think you need libfossil to do this. Looking at the hello world example

Re: [fossil-users] FossilFS. Was: libfossil + fuse

2014-04-24 Thread Matt Welland
+1 (and I'm bumming I only get a 1 for my +) This would be a really sweet addition to fossil. Consider caching under /var/tmp or something so that performance is decent. I'm not sure you'd be able to deliver a precompiled binary with dependencies on fuse but being able to compile in this

Re: [fossil-users] FossilFS. Was: libfossil + fuse

2014-04-24 Thread Andy Goth
On 4/24/2014 5:04 PM, Matt Welland wrote: I'm not sure you'd be able to deliver a precompiled binary with dependencies on fuse Then call it through pointers obtained from dlopen() and dlsym(). Now have fun making that portable. :^) -- Andy Goth | andrew.m.goth/at/gmail/dot/com