Mime Digest format might help, at least in the short term, depending on your
email client.
That is consider that each message posted to the list was sent out as a mime
digest with just one message, and was sent out immediately rather than being
held till a scheduled release time.
The envelope
With regards to replacing the From: address but leaving the display name, that
could have adverse impact on e-mail client address books and auto complete,
since many email clients these days do the wrong thing and only show the
display name, hiding the email address.
a) How does your address b
> Le 30 juin 2016 à 20:47, Ron W a écrit :
>
>
>
> As for the From header, a newer version of the Mailman list manager would get
> us the option to replace just the address in the From header.
+1
> That would help mitigate the problem that Richard was trying to patch by
> configurin
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:38 AM, K. Fossil user <
ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>
> As I said, the correct behavior should be : "reply-to" the Fossil SCM
> list...
>
Looking at the email headers, I see "Reply-to: Fossil SCM user's discussion
", so that part is correct.
As for the From
hat someone will found them...
Thank you for reading.
Best Regards
K.
De : Andy Bradford
À : K. Fossil user
Cc : Fossil SCM User's Discussion
Envoyé le : Mercredi 29 juin 2016 21h49
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.
>Thus said "
On Jun 28, 2016 1:54 PM, "K. Fossil user"
wrote:
>
> Ah...
> Let's play YOUR game then.
> People ask for something then you ask others to follow because it seems
that most people (let say : five or more?) guys speak about it ?
> And of course those guys are EXPERT (or I suppose according to you or
Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:51:29 -:
> 1) if numbers count, then 5 is not sufficient in front of 519, and 519
> is not sufficient either in front of the numerous GIT users...
519 subscribers does not mean 519 humans.
At any rate, how long should they be given to resp
Ah...Let's play YOUR game then.People ask for something then you ask others to
follow because it seems that most people (let say : five or more?) guys speak
about it ?And of course those guys are EXPERT (or I suppose according to you or
the fossil team or whoever you want) so everyone should fol
Thus said "K. Fossil user" on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:10:53 -:
> I don't understand why the Fossil team don't create a poll about the
> Mailing list behavior people may want?
Are the responses not sent to the previous thread regarding the changes
sufficient?
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 40005
Thus said jungle Boogie on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:08:16 -0700:
> So is this basically how it was configured previously? Your email
> address is present in the header so spam and non-spam can be sent
> off-line.
Yes, it would appear to be configured as previously.
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp:
etc.).
Best Regards
K.
De : Gour
À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Envoyé le : Lundi 27 juin 2016 7h50
Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:28 +0800
Barry Arthur
wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that.
However, we
On Jun 26, 2016 9:13 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote:
>
> The "From:" removal has been turned off and in its place "Reply-To:"
> removal has been turned on. This is a test message to verify the new
> configuration.
So is this basically how it was configured previously? Your email address
is present in
Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:12:50 +0200:
> Further changes might occur depending on how this one goes.
What are your thoughts on some of the proposed methods for attempting to
auto-unsubscribe any bots?
Specifically, having a daily MOTD that is emailed to all subscribers and
wh
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 14:05:28 +0800
Barry Arthur
wrote:
> I'm glad to hear that.
However, we do not know the number of subscribers via Gmane - I'm the
one and survived. :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Before giving up this present body, if one is able to tolerate
the urges of the material senses and c
I'm glad to hear that.
On 27 June 2016 at 13:31, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Barry Arthur
> wrote:
> > Any stats on how many we lost during the blackout?
>
> 0. Net number of subscribers is unchanged.
>
>
> --
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> ___
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Barry Arthur wrote:
> Any stats on how many we lost during the blackout?
0. Net number of subscribers is unchanged.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
h
h it anymore :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Steve
>> ---
>>
>>Original Message
>> From: Richard Hipp
>> Sent: Monday, 27 June 2016 14:13
>> To: fossil-users
>> Reply To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
>> Subject: [fossil-users] Further ma
discussion
Subject: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.
The "From:" removal has been turned off and in its place "Reply-To:"
removal has been turned on. This is a test message to verify the new
configuration. Further changes might occur depending on how this
Works, don't touch it anymore :)
Cheers,
Steve
---
Original Message
From: Richard Hipp
Sent: Monday, 27 June 2016 14:13
To: fossil-users
Reply To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.
The "From:" removal has be
The "From:" removal has been turned off and in its place "Reply-To:"
removal has been turned on. This is a test message to verify the new
configuration. Further changes might occur depending on how this one
goes.
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
