Re: [fossil-users] Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files

2009-09-25 Thread Daniel Clark
D. Richard Hipp wrote: See: fossil test-sha1sum * Perhaps the sha1sum command should be promoted to a documented and supported command IMHO this would be useful; however it turns out that I didn't need it to add Fossil support for Bcfg2 (which FYI should be included in Bcfg2 1.0 which

Re: [fossil-users] Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files

2009-09-22 Thread Daniel Clark
D. Richard Hipp wrote: On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Daniel Clark wrote: Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files - I'm guessing I'm just getting the syntax wrong somehow; if not, I'll go enter this as a bug. If so, perhaps the documentation should have an example of

Re: [fossil-users] Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files

2009-09-22 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Daniel Clark dcl...@pobox.com wrote: (a) If the file is the same as the version checked out of fossil, or has been locally modified since then. i miss this, too. You can get it for the whole repo with fossil status, but i don't know of a way to get that info

Re: [fossil-users] Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files

2009-09-22 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Daniel Clark wrote: Another argument for including this functionality in fossil itself would be that people running fossil on Windows and possibly Mac OS X don't have easy access to the sha1sum command. See: fossil test-sha1sum * Perhaps the sha1sum command

Re: [fossil-users] Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files

2009-09-21 Thread D. Richard Hipp
On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:27 AM, Daniel Clark wrote: Getting fossil: not a valid object name for fossil info on files - I'm guessing I'm just getting the syntax wrong somehow; if not, I'll go enter this as a bug. If so, perhaps the documentation should have an example of correct syntax. fossil