On 25/09/14 13:18, Matt Wellans wrote:
> I suspect fossil would slow down faster than git in that scenario but I'd
> also argue that because fossil is easier to understand that scenario is a
> little less likely to happen.
Let's all be honest here; this a unique case where you'd _want_ it to
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Matt Wellans wrote:
> I suspect fossil would slow down faster than git in that scenario but I'd
> also argue that because fossil is easier to understand
>
The memory costs for fossil (due to delta generation and R-card
calculation) would quickly explode here, beca
users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: [fossil-users] Horror story about git - Forever Alone
>Morning,
>
>just read it today on Reddit:
>
>http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2hctgh/horror_story_about_git_forever_alone/
>
>Article is at: http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/
On 2014-09-25 08:44:04, Gour wrote:
> Morning,
>
> just read it today on Reddit:
>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2hctgh/horror_story_about_git_forever_alone/
>
> Article is at: http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Forever-Alone.aspx
>
> What about Fossil in the same scenario?
>
>
Morning,
just read it today on Reddit:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/2hctgh/horror_story_about_git_forever_alone/
Article is at: http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Forever-Alone.aspx
What about Fossil in the same scenario?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
>From wherever the mind wanders due t
5 matches
Mail list logo