Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-05-24 Thread Lluís Batlle
Hello Richard and friends, I continue below this old thread, where I still had not found deeper what was failing in our merges. Now I add more information. 2011/3/3 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com Maybe the problem is in the handling of renames,

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-05-24 Thread Lluís Batlle
Hello back, just to add something to the letter I just sent with all the details, at the first letter of this thread http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg03883.html we mentioned this next proposal as a solution to the problem: So we propose that, for the merge between

[fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-03-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
Hello, we had an issue merging with renames here. The 'test-shortest-path' takes what we think is a *WRONG* path for the merge to happen. We had two long-standing branches, that both were updated from trunk from time to time. One was merged into trunk only recently, altough it has been there for

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-03-03 Thread Richard Hipp
2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com Hello, we had an issue merging with renames here. The 'test-shortest-path' takes what we think is a *WRONG* path for the merge to happen. We had two long-standing branches, that both were updated from trunk from time to time. One was

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-03-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com This could have worked, if the first merge of the end of January did not have any rename. It had renames, and due to this, the last merge attempt complained about this like

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-03-03 Thread Richard Hipp
2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com This could have worked, if the first merge of the end of January did not have any rename. It had renames, and due to

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-03-03 Thread Lluís Batlle i Rossell
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:57:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com This could have worked, if the first merge of the end of

Re: [fossil-users] Merges, renames and shortest path.

2011-03-03 Thread Richard Hipp
2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:57:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 10:39:11AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: 2011/3/3 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com