Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-17 Thread Roy Marples
On Monday 16 Mar 2015 12:07:58 Richard Hipp wrote: > On 3/16/15, Richie Adler wrote: > > After the latest upgrades, I've been unable to see the timeline graphs if > > I > > have more than 36 items in the timeline. The space for the graph remains, > > but > > nothing is drawn. > > > > The weirdest

Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-17 Thread Richie Adler
Andy Bradford decía, en el mensaje "Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)" del 17/3/2015 1:48:13: >> Disabled NoScript and for more security restarted Firefox with no >> extensions enabled. Same thing. > > I wonder if perhap

Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-16 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richie Adler on Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:53:34 -0300: > > JavaScript issue? > > Disabled NoScript and for more security restarted Firefox with no > extensions enabled. Same thing. I wonder if perhaps some cross-site scripting blocking tool is blocking it? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4

Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-16 Thread Richard Hipp
If you do "View Page Source", does the HTML appear to be truncated? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-16 Thread Richie Adler
El 16/03/2015 a las 17:10, Tontyna escibió: >> The weirdest thing is that I have reverted to old versions and I'm still >> unable to see the full graph! > First idea: cached stylesheet? Cleared the cache to no avail. > Although that wouldn't explain why you can see >36 items on the Fossil > site

Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-16 Thread Tontyna
The weirdest thing is that I have reverted to old versions and I'm still unable to see the full graph! First idea: cached stylesheet? Although that wouldn't explain why you can see >36 items on the Fossil site but not on localhost. Can't imagine that the HTML served by fossil.exe is sooo diff

Re: [fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-16 Thread Richard Hipp
On 3/16/15, Richie Adler wrote: > After the latest upgrades, I've been unable to see the timeline graphs if I > have more than 36 items in the timeline. The space for the graph remains, > but > nothing is drawn. > > The weirdest thing is that I have reverted to old versions and I'm still > unable

[fossil-users] Missing timeline graph above 36 timeline items (?!)

2015-03-16 Thread Richie Adler
After the latest upgrades, I've been unable to see the timeline graphs if I have more than 36 items in the timeline. The space for the graph remains, but nothing is drawn. The weirdest thing is that I have reverted to old versions and I'm still unable to see the full graph! I can see it in the Fo