On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:24:16AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
2011/6/2 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
What do you think about the problem? Do you understand it already, or you
would
really like a repository with the troubles, in order to start?
I'd have to recreate one
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:35:09AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
2011/6/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
Hello,
still with the opened issue
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg04716.html,
we commited such a 'bad merge' into one of our branches. As
2011/6/2 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
What do you think about the problem? Do you understand it already, or you
would
really like a repository with the troubles, in order to start?
I'd have to recreate one artificially, to show the problems, as I've only
seen
that in the
Hello,
still with the opened issue
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg04716.html ,
we commited such a 'bad merge' into one of our branches. As there explained, the
'shortest path' used to calculate the renames was clearly wrong.
We decided to go to the previous
2011/6/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
Hello,
still with the opened issue
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg04716.html,
we commited such a 'bad merge' into one of our branches. As there
explained, the
'shortest path' used to calculate the renames
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:35:09AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
2011/6/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
Hello,
still with the opened issue
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg04716.html,
we commited such a 'bad merge' into one of our branches. As
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:35:09AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
2011/6/1 Lluís Batlle i Rossell virik...@gmail.com
Hello,
still with the opened issue
http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg04716.html,
we commited such a 'bad merge' into one of our branches. As
7 matches
Mail list logo
