Re: [fossil-users] fossil performance testing and is it possible to increase the sqlite3 timeout?

2011-09-03 Thread Dmitry Chestnykh
On Sep 3, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: So now, why wal is not the default? I'm having a trunk build from few days back and a freshly created repo is in delete mode… See disadvantages here: http://www.sqlite.org/draft/wal.html The biggest one is that it requires two

Re: [fossil-users] fossil performance testing and is it possible to increase the sqlite3 timeout?

2011-09-03 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Sep 3, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote: So now, why wal is not the default? I'm having a trunk build from few days back and a freshly created repo is in delete mode… See disadvantages here: http://www.sqlite.org/draft/wal.html The biggest one is that it requires two

[fossil-users] fossil performance testing and is it possible to increase the sqlite3 timeout?

2011-09-02 Thread Matt Welland
We are revisiting fossil for use in our team and I've been doing a little performance testing. One thing that we've seen is when two people access the central repo simultaneously sometimes sync can fail and you get the continue without sync: y/N question. This is benign enough and recovery is

Re: [fossil-users] fossil performance testing and is it possible to increase the sqlite3 timeout?

2011-09-02 Thread Richard Hipp
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: We are revisiting fossil for use in our team and I've been doing a little performance testing. One thing that we've seen is when two people access the central repo simultaneously sometimes sync can fail and you get the