On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote:
It's basically a JS-like data model (derived initially, in fact, from the
same JSON code which runs fossil's JSON API), but provides a facility for
clients to plug their own types into it (in a type-safe way - you don't
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
headed off a scheme for implementing our own shared library mechanism by
offering to embed a simple, low overhead scripting engine. though the
language chosen was not my first choice (for implementing the embedding),
it
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:55:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
Hi, all,
FYI: the experimental libfossil script bindings have grown somewhat larger
than originally anticipated, and i've started documenting them in a public
Google Doc:
Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote:
Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be maintained in
a Fossil wiki instead of Google docs?
Yeah, i see the irony in it, but Fossil's
Hi, all,
FYI: the experimental libfossil script bindings have grown somewhat larger
than originally anticipated, and i've started documenting them in a public
Google Doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YsVMBNJfuZC7tIxqhNgK21O7dQyV0mnsfQRn0GMpU5I/view
(A few of you have been given write
5 matches
Mail list logo