Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-26 Thread Ron Wilson
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote: It's basically a JS-like data model (derived initially, in fact, from the same JSON code which runs fossil's JSON API), but provides a facility for clients to plug their own types into it (in a type-safe way - you don't

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: headed off a scheme for implementing our own shared library mechanism by offering to embed a simple, low overhead scripting engine. though the language chosen was not my first choice (for implementing the embedding), it

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-24 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:55:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: Hi, all, FYI: the experimental libfossil script bindings have grown somewhat larger than originally anticipated, and i've started documenting them in a public Google Doc: Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-24 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote: Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be maintained in a Fossil wiki instead of Google docs? Yeah, i see the irony in it, but Fossil's

[fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-18 Thread Stephan Beal
Hi, all, FYI: the experimental libfossil script bindings have grown somewhat larger than originally anticipated, and i've started documenting them in a public Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YsVMBNJfuZC7tIxqhNgK21O7dQyV0mnsfQRn0GMpU5I/view (A few of you have been given write