Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mar 13, 2015 10:02 PM, "Andy Bradford" wrote: , but it would seem that this is irrelevant. All that > matters for Fossil 1.27 and older is that rid=1 is also type=ci. The ONLY ways to get a checkin with rid 1 is for it to be the magic initial checkin OR for it to be the first change in the re

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Marcel Graf
sorry, forgot to say what the image is about: its the timeline after the "swapped" the check-in on rid=1 by "reconstruct", but did not do update before commit. if anybody is interested, here is the git fast-export dump for a simple one check-in: git-one.dump Description: Binary data

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Marcel Graf
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2015-03-13 15:56 GMT+01:00 Marcel Graf : > > Well, to kind of answer my own question: I tried it, and yes, it happens > > too. Only using fossil version 1.27! > > Interesting. Thanks! > > Another way to trigger the 'problem' is using "fossil

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:28:47 +0100: > Another way to trigger the 'problem' is using "fossil reconstruct". > This function reconstructs the repository from artifacts on disk, it > is very unlikely that the initial empty checkin is encountered as > first artifact and

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:28:47 +0100: > Another way to trigger the 'problem' is using "fossil reconstruct". > This function reconstructs the repository from artifacts on disk, it > is very unlikely that the initial empty checkin is encountered as > first artifact and

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-03-13 15:56 GMT+01:00 Marcel Graf : > Well, to kind of answer my own question: I tried it, and yes, it happens > too. Only using fossil version 1.27! Interesting. Thanks! Another way to trigger the 'problem' is using "fossil reconstruct". This function reconstructs the repository from artifa

Re: [fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Marcel Graf
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Marcel Graf wrote: > Hello everybody > > If I understood correctly from the recent discussion about repositories > without initial check-ins (How to fix parallel timeline), the problem of > two disconnected DAGs (and seemingly "lost" files) is triggered if > > A:

[fossil-users] missing initial empty check-in & repository from import

2015-03-13 Thread Marcel Graf
Hello everybody If I understood correctly from the recent discussion about repositories without initial check-ins (How to fix parallel timeline), the problem of two disconnected DAGs (and seemingly "lost" files) is triggered if A: fossil version 1.27 (or older) is used to open and work with a B: