Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-30 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 28, 2015, at 2:27 PM, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > > lighttpd > deploys my pre-cooked clones whilst fossil clone is unavailable lighttpd supports SCGI: http://redmine.lighttpd.net/projects/1/wiki/Docs_ModSCGI Is there a good reason, then, not to try that as an alternative to stunnel4?

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-30 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 28, 2015, at 4:00 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Perhaps the issue is a subtle interaction between Fossil and how some > VPS'es handle SSL connections? A packet capture shows the clone proceeds for about 140 packets, then the server initiates a graceful TCP shutdown (4-way FIN/ACK) follow

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said fossil@9ox.net on Sat, 28 Nov 2015 21:27:26 +: > Yes, good point. I tested and that https for wget works reliably. The > wget is just for a starting 'clone' pre-made on the server that I can > download and sync from: I'm using lighttpd on 443 and it has its own > ssl engine s

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-28 Thread Joe Mistachkin
I've seen these types of errors from both "fossil clone" and "fossil update" where the response was truncated. It seemed to be an issue with the VPS I was using at the time. Perhaps the issue is a subtle interaction between Fossil and how some VPS'es handle SSL connections? -- Joe Mistachkin _

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-28 Thread fossil . nrb
> From: Andy Bradford > Sent: 28 November 2015 20:09 > To: fossil@9ox.net > Cc: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > > Thus said fossil@9ox.net on Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:30:16 +: > > > This works: > > wget http://51.255.41.162/my2M7data.fossil.clone > ^ > Aha, this i

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said fossil@9ox.net on Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:30:16 +: > This works: > wget http://51.255.41.162/my2M7data.fossil.clone ^ Aha, this is HTTP, and is different from from the clone URL below. What if you were to try: wget https://51.255.41.162/my2M7data.fossil.clone

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-28 Thread fossil . nrb
done, sent: 245 received: 481280 ip: 51.255.41.162 server returned an error - clone aborted > From: Warren Young [mailto:w...@etr-usa.com]> Sent: 27 November 2015 22:05> > To: Fossil SCM user's discussion > > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server returned

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-27 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 26, 2015, at 10:36 AM, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > > root@vps221852:~# ./fossil clone > http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki fossil.fossil > getaddrinfo() fails: Name or service not known > Clone done, sent: 0 received: 0 ip: > server returned an er

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-26 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said fossil@9ox.net on Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:36:22 +: > Without stunnel4, a clean VPS install + fossil, I find a way not(!) to > be able to clone from www.fossil-scm.org: "getaddrinfo() fails: Name > or service not known". cat /etc/resolv.conf Perhaps you have a nameserver that is f

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-26 Thread fossil . nrb
Young [mailto:w...@etr-usa.com] Sent: 23 November 2015 > 19:29 To: Fossil SCM user's discussion > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted On Nov > 23, 2015, at 10:28 AM, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > > # root@vps221852:~# fossil clone > > https://n

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-23 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 23, 2015, at 10:28 AM, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > > # root@vps221852:~# fossil clone > https://nrb@101.102.103.104:1443/my6418432byterepos my6418432byterepos.fossil > # password for nrb: > # response truncated: got 3512076 bytes of 3615709 > # Clone done, sent: 253 received: 3512320 ip

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-23 Thread Richard Hipp
On 11/23/15, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > Hi, > > I get a consistent fossil clone error with my server settings over stunnel4. I'm sorry you are having trouble. I don't know what the problem might be. Please note, however, that the canonical Fossil self-hosting repository (https://www.fossil-scm

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-23 Thread fossil . nrb
#x27;s discussion > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted > > On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:59 PM, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > > > > $ fossil version > > This is fossil version 1.33 > > 1.34 is out. That said, I tested with an even older Fos

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-19 Thread Warren Young
On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:59 PM, fossil@9ox.net wrote: > > $ fossil version > This is fossil version 1.33 1.34 is out. That said, I tested with an even older Fossil on Cygwin, and it works for me. > $ fossil clone ssh://nrb@101.102.103.104//var/repos/test C:\test.fossil I see a bunch of poten

Re: [fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-18 Thread Eduard
Hi, Not sure if this is a bug. But you may want to try cloning/pulling from "ssh://nrb@101.102.103.104//path/to/repo.fossil" (instead of a directory with an open checkout). My first guess is that it's a difference between Windows and UNIX fossil, in particular that the file containing the current

[fossil-users] server returned an error - clone aborted

2015-11-18 Thread fossil . nrb
Hi, I am stuck getting Windows to work with my repo (88KB). I have it syncing between two Debian environments (one a VPS) both using Stunnel. But to pull it onto a windows desktop seems to be evading me. I tried three flavours so far. Cygwin, Windows, Windows + Cygwin's ssh. The last one that