Hello all,
I would like to see this feature request granted. Is there any
objection to merging branch [ticket-967cedbf20] to trunk?
It will allow the fossil extra and fossil clean to be given
extra arguments, specifying a subset (directories or files)
of the directory structure where the
Just a quick heads up for
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/tktview?name=752aa31a6d since I don't have
access to the sqlite3 mailing list/repo.
It seems that the latest version of SQLite3 fails to build for Android (the
Android Bionic libc doesn't have posix_fallocate).
Considering the widespread
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Michai Ramakers wrote:
On 19 June 2013 10:25, Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com wrote:
I'm surprised, but yeah, its looking that way. I just ran the test again
using the same fossil binary on XP and Windows 7. The clone failed on XP
but succeeded
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
set a = [expr 231%0 ]
If Run TH1 is pressed, fossil crash.
Stephen, check your th1 fork too.
LOL! Thanks for the head's up - just last night, coincidentally, i fixed
this same problem in my conceptual fork of th1.
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
case OP_DIVIDE: iRes = iLeft/iRight; break;
case OP_MODULUS: iRes = iLeft%iRight; break;
The error message isn't the best, but it's fixed now:
set a = [expr 231/0 ]
Divide by 0: 231
Hi Stephan,
Just noted that JSON (CSON) on win32/64 cannot use 64-bit integers. My
attempt to fix this is in:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/50e8847df7
But becasue CSON is an amalgamation, I'm sure the real
fix should be somewhere else.
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 09:05:50AM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Michai Ramakers wrote:
On 19 June 2013 10:25, Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com wrote:
I'm surprised, but yeah, its looking that way. I just ran the test again
using the same fossil
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see this feature request granted. Is there any
objection to merging branch [ticket-967cedbf20] to trunk?
:)
Any chance of adding the same to ls as well?
Side-note: the graph view in the www ui never
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
That's the fix i would have suggested. i'll get it added to the upstream
build. Feel free to merge that one to the trunk - it'll just get
overwritten the next time i pull in upstream (which is undergoing yet
another
2013/6/15 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Edward Berner e...@bernerfam.com wrote:
Hello,
db_last_insert_rowid() is defined in db.c to return an i64, but every
use of the function stores the result in an int.
I guess it might cause problems - if you created a
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hm, I would suggest to change the return-type from i64 to size_t. On
32-bit systems that would double the maximum number of artifacts,
*shiver*
i've had nothing but problems when trying to rely on size_t across
2013/6/20 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
*shiver*
i've had nothing but problems when trying to rely on size_t across
32/64-bit portable apps.
Sorry, i should have qualified that a bit better: problems not
2013/6/20 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:
Making this change will only introduce new, real bugs that impact everyday
users.
Thanks! That's OK with me. But then the question remains why the
return-type of db_last_insert_rowid() is not int then?
Regards,
Jan Nijtmans.
+1
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see this feature request granted. Is there any
objection to merging branch [ticket-967cedbf20] to trunk?
:)
Any
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.comwrote:
2013/6/20 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:
Making this change will only introduce new, real bugs that impact
everyday
users.
Thanks! That's OK with me. But then the question remains why the
return-type of
15 matches
Mail list logo
