On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
I’ve so far managed to avoid using the feature myself, but I have been on
teams where people tried to use this to some effect, and unfortunately, the
interfaces always seemed to scale very poorly. That’s not to say that
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Joseph R. Justice jayare...@gmail.comwrote:
...Some random thoughts on Fossil v2 as a library (call it libfossil2)
and as a default client / server binary which makes use of the library
(call it fossil2client or fossil2scm, I seem to have used both names),
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:29:36 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
I’ve so far managed to avoid using the feature myself, but I have been
on
teams where people tried to use this to some effect, and
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:03:09 +0200
j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
While the Lua scripting enabled me to gain a level of
sophistication and relative rigor in the process more than what I
could get from normal UNIX
plumbing, if my project wasn’t in Lua in the first
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:29:32 +0200, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:03:09 +0200
j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
While the Lua scripting enabled me to gain a level of
sophistication and relative rigor in the process
Hi,
Not aimed at anyone in particular, but if you are going to suggest a
particular language, can you please point to an interpreter that is easily
embeddable into fossil? That seems to be the problem with at least JS and
Python, and seems to be Lua's strong point. There's no point in discussing
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Laurens Van Houtven _...@lvh.io wrote:
Not aimed at anyone in particular, but if you are going to suggest a
particular language, can you please point to an interpreter that is easily
embeddable into fossil? That seems to be the problem with at least JS and
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 13:36:37 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
Xcb uses an async mechanism, it creates a cookie, sends it and data to the
external code, keep working. External code calls xcb, sends the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
Yes it is. There's a big difference between Project and Repository.
There's the fossil project, only one, but there are lots of repositories
and fossil project forks that aren't the main 'Fossil Project'. I don't
want to
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:17:47 +0200
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es wrote:
Yes it is. There's a big difference between Project and Repository.
There's the fossil project, only one, but there are lots of repositories
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
With regards to scripting and fossil as a separate library, I actually see
these as separate things. Having Fossil as a separate library allows other
programs to use fossil capabilities, while any scripting interface, such
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yes, there has been some confusion about the whole which scripting
language? topic. The fact is, once we have a library, anyone can tie any
amendment... scripting, to me, is important mainly because it provides an
Dear Stephan:
Thanks for the response. I think I’m a little confused about what the intended
use cases for a scripting language are? When I think of scripting the Fossil
SCM I’m envisioning like post and pre-commit hooks, or adding support for a
different sort of Wiki format, or integrating a
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
Thanks for the response. I think I’m a little confused about what the
intended use cases for a scripting language are?
Scriptability, more than anything, is simply a benchmark which says, this
app is extensible.
Dear Stephan:
Thanks for your explanation. I, of course, agree that there are plenty of
interesting benefits that one gains from having a fossil(3) in addition to a
fossil(1). On the other hand, my initial email and my comments have nothing to
do with a fossil(3) interface. What I’ve been
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
distinguish these use cases and the technical solutions that present
themselves for these cases. Everything you’ve mentioned in your previous
email related directly to how one might have access to fossil within
another
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.comwrote:
... to /reports?
the name /stats_report just seems cumbersome to me.
I have no objections. I suggest you want a few days and if you get no
I personally have no objections, but as a matter of business and
visibility, perhaps do final last call for objections/alternatives! on a
business day.
On Jul 23, 2013 12:59 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On
Here are a couple features that would make fossil a reasonable replacement
for zim wiki and might be worth considering for fossil2.0.
1. Ability to Edit/save/commit files from the UI.
2. In wiki files square brackets at beginning of line parse into check box
list (as is done in zim wiki).
On
Bit late to the party, but my 2 cents
1) Fossil as a library or API with the fossil executable as a single file
built on top of it. One could even consider a SCGI/FCGI type of interface
where the fossil binary serves JSON+BSON requests.
2) Ticket notifications by email (notification when merged
Hi all,
I've notice that here:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/artifact/111c393f1bb93a3585078d5ee23e0b3ecc1408fe?ln=97,101
the -e none argument to ssh is removed when __MINGW32__ is defined. Is
there a reason for that ? On my windows setup, I have mingw and I use
openssh that come with msys.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Konstantin Khomoutov
flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
[...]
But please don't also miss out a first-hand experience of someone who
implemented a well-visible program centered around Lua: [1], [2].
Personally, I find that minimality (of the runtime) is the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
When fossil runs, it can dynamically link in any of the shared objects
that it finds there, and these can register additional functionality with
I think these things support each other. Specifically, with respect to Tcl
(and likely Guile, Lua), scripting support can come by embedding the Tcl
interpreter inside the app (ie: the standalone fossil executable), by
linking libtcl with fossil, and having fossil call into it appropriately.
Dear Stephan:
Here’s my attempt to define and clearly distinguish the various parts of this
discussion into a piece that might be useful for talking about these things in
the future. In my opinion, there are a few mutually orthogonal things to think
about:
The fossil API itself, which is
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are a couple features that would make fossil a reasonable replacement
for zim wiki and might be worth considering for fossil2.0.
1. Ability to Edit/save/commit files from the UI.
That one's been on my TODO for a
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Mark Janssen mpc.jans...@gmail.comwrote:
Bit late to the party, but my 2 cents
Not late at all - the ball's just getting rolling.
1) Fossil as a library or API with the fossil executable as a single file
built on top of it. One could even consider a
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems to me it would act like a static binary unless requested to load one
or more shared libraries, only calling whatever hook services are
registered by the shared libraries. If no libraries are loaded, then the
binary
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:32 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
The first example would be Fossil with hooks, while the second would be
full scripting environment drives the operation, with full access to
fossil routines.
I'm personally more interested in the second.To my senses, it's
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:57:46 -0400:
the -e none argument to ssh is removed when __MINGW32__ is defined.
Is there a reason for that ? On my windows setup, I have mingw and I
use openssh that come with msys.
I'm not sure why it would be this way. If all versions of
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us wrote:
against a fossil(3) library. This functionality can therefore be provided
by the fossil(1) executable program as well as from a separate shared
object against which the fossil(1) program links.
Right - that's just a
I've started a fossil repo by importing a git repo to my local laptop, and
then cloning the repo over to my target production web server.
For testing, I've exposed the fossil server like this:
/usr/local/bin/fossil server /home/fossil/myrepo.fossil --th-trace -P 10080
--baseurl
Thus said Eric Rubin-Smith on Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:02:11 -0400:
/usr/local/bin/fossil server /home/fossil/myrepo.fossil --th-trace -P 10080
--baseurl http://localhost:10080/
Try removing the --baseurl option.
It works for me when I do:
fossil server /tmp/test.fossil
ssh -L
Thus said Andy Bradford on 23 Jul 2013 20:22:37 -0600:
fossil server /tmp/test.fossil
Of course I meant:
fossil server -P 10080 /tmp/test.fossil
ssh -L 10080:localhost:10080 remote
Cheers,
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 400051ef3c17
___
Yes, that works for the test case. But I think I'll need --baseurl for
when I put fossil behind an SSL-terminating reverse proxy and want to
access it using the company FQDN.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Andy Bradford
amb-sendok-1377224557.emjjjkijcgiknbipb...@bradfords.org wrote:
Thus
i know you guys are probably sick of hearing about the hypothetical v2 by
now, but i haven't slept and need an outlet ;).
A brief demo of all [two] currently working v2 features can be seen here:
http://fossil.wanderinghorse.net/repos/f2/index.cgi/wiki?name=home
It can open _and_ close an
36 matches
Mail list logo
