Re: [fossil-users] Latest MinGW does not need _USE_32BIT_TIME_T anymore

2014-02-24 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2014-02-21 13:56 GMT+01:00 Jan Nijtmans : > I would say it's a GO. Any objections? The Speed-up as suggested by Samuel Debionne is merged to trunk now. I noticed considerable speedup on Windows and Cygwin (up to 40%). I tested it on Ubuntu as well, but there the speedup was not impressive, just a

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-24 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:55:51PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: > Hi, all, > > FYI: the experimental libfossil script bindings have grown somewhat larger > than originally anticipated, and i've started documenting them in a public > Google Doc: Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be m

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-24 Thread Stephan Beal
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be maintained in a > Fossil wiki instead of Google docs? > Yeah, i see the irony in it, but Fossil's just not the tool for what i want in this case: simplicity and real-time collaboration[1].

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil script binding docs

2014-02-24 Thread Martin Gagnon
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:04:33PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Chad Perrin wrote: > > Is there some reason this kind of thing shouldn't be maintained in > a Fossil wiki instead of Google docs? > > > Yeah, i see the irony in it, but Fossil's just not the