Re: [fossil-users] false positive UTF-8 test

2016-07-20 Thread Warren Young
On Jul 19, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > > I'm using Fossil to store GPG encrypted passwords; By that I assume it’s a pure binary file with all byte values having equal probability of appearing? If so, it’s possible you’re just getting “lucky.” Since every possible byte stream

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

2016-07-20 Thread Warren Young
On Jul 17, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 7/15/16, Warren Young wrote: >> >> In order to view [embedded documentation] content in the wiki, the viewing >> user >> needs checkout rights on the whole repository. > > In general, this is true. But there is one obscure exception. >

Re: [fossil-users] false positive UTF-8 test

2016-07-20 Thread Svyatoslav Mishyn
(Wed, 20 Jul 08:42) Warren Young: > On Jul 19, 2016, at 1:16 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > > Also I have .fossil-settings/binary-glob (with *.gpg) in the repository. > > So what problem is the false positive giving you, then? I just expected if there is a binary-glob file, fossil won't check an

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

2016-07-20 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Warren Young on Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:16:53 -0600: > https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/embeddeddoc.wiki > > In order to view such content in the wiki, the viewing user needs > checkout rights on the whole repository. If you can't give your > viewer-only users tha

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

2016-07-20 Thread Warren Young
On Jul 20, 2016, at 12:50 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > > Thus said Warren Young on Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:16:53 -0600: > >> https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/embeddeddoc.wiki >> >> In order to view such content in the wiki, the viewing user needs >> checkout rights on the whole

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

2016-07-20 Thread jungle Boogie
On 20 July 2016 at 11:50, Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said Warren Young on Fri, 15 Jul 2016 12:16:53 -0600: > >> https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/embeddeddoc.wiki >> >> In order to view such content in the wiki, the viewing user needs >> checkout rights on the whole reposit

[fossil-users] Summertime ...

2016-07-20 Thread Rolf Ade
... and it doesn't happen much, at the sqlite timeline as well as the fossil timeline. Enjoy the couples of days off! As it's unusual hot here and that would be some kind of excuse to just tinker around I tried to come up with an orderd list of the longest time spans without any commit in a repos

[fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread sky5walk
I've noticed weird multi-line timelines with v1.35. Is this a bug or is it the skin run amok? This repo has only trunk and 1 very old branch. https://www.reddit.com/r/fossil/comments/4tti7k/fossil_v1353aa86af6aa_is_this_multiline_timeline/ Thanks for Fossil! __

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread Richard Hipp
It is difficult to say if this is a bug or a weird repo. I'd need access to the repo to tell. On 7/20/16, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > I've noticed weird multi-line timelines with v1.35. > Is this a bug or is it the skin run amok? > This repo has only trunk and 1 very old branch. > > https://www.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread sky5walk
​Thanks for checking. I am confident we have the tip after merging from multiple user commits. But, it is certainly confusing to confirm this visually. http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/a78e51185326b91f Edited Comment: Partially revert [f73411025e8ebec7]

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread Richard Hipp
Maybe also run "fossil rebuild". And/or "fossil test-integrity". Please report any findings. On 7/20/16, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > ​Thanks for checking. I am confident we have the tip after merging from > multiple user commits. But, it is certainly confusing to confirm this > visually. > > htt

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread sky5walk
Unfortunately, same results: c:\myrepo>fossil rebuild myrepo.fossil 100.0% complete... c:\myrepo>fossil test-integrity myrepo.fossil 4414 non-phantom blobs (out of 4414 total) checked: 0 errors low-level database integrity-check: ok I'll try compiling latest code. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:41

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On 7/20/16, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > I'll try compiling latest code. Always good to do, even if you are not having problems. But my guess is that it will make no difference What does the /bloblist URL show you. Do you have many artifacts. Do any of them show up as "???" -- D. Richard

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread sky5walk
Curious, I was not familiar with /bloblist URL? I found it in the sitemap as 'List Of Artifacts'. But it does show all 4414 entries with valid events: ticket/wiki/filename/commit. On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 7/20/16, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > > I'll try compili

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil v1.35[3aa86af6aa] - Is this multi-line timeline a bug?

2016-07-20 Thread sky5walk
Yahoo! Fossil v1.36[2dec4bdfcb] fixed the problem! Compiled with VS2013 Express. Wow, that was weird and confusing. So glad to have unified timeline back. Thanks for Fossil! On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:37 PM, wrote: > Curious, I was not familiar with /bloblist URL? > I found it in the sitemap as

Re: [fossil-users] false positive UTF-8 test

2016-07-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > I'm using Fossil to store GPG encrypted passwords; > > and one file Fossil detects as UTF-8: > > /home/juef/tmp: f test-looks-like-utf abc.gpg > ... > If someone want to get that file, I will send it. > > Also I have .fossil-settings/bin