Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-02 Thread Gour
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:31:06 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote: > Your feedback on this new feature is appreciated. What about ability to add the whole directory containing unversioned files? I used (fish)shell scripting to do it, but still... Sincerely, Gour -- A person who is not

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-02 Thread Gour
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:31:06 -0400 Richard Hipp wrote: > Your feedback on this new feature is appreciated. I've added one whole directory with several subfolders (via shell scripting) and an see them with 'fossil unver ls'. However, the same set of files is also listed as

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-02 Thread Richard Hipp
On 9/2/16, Gour wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:31:06 -0400 > Richard Hipp wrote: > >> Your feedback on this new feature is appreciated. > > I've added one whole directory with several subfolders (via shell > scripting) and an see them with 'fossil unver ls'.

Re: [fossil-users] Incremental import breaks repo.

2016-09-02 Thread Karel Gardas
I've retested with: This is fossil version 1.36 [35d43fd98f] 2016-08-27 21:16:29 UTC and the behavior is still the same. More, on the client side which would like to update from the git -> fossil incremental mirror I see this: changes: None. Already up-to-date WARNING: multiple open leaf

Re: [fossil-users] Incremental import breaks repo.

2016-09-02 Thread Svyatoslav Mishyn
Hi, (Fri, 02 Sep 19:14) Karel Gardas: > My question is: is it possible somehow to connect those open leafs > together to form one line of development which is really what's in to > fossil imported git repo? Maybe `fossil reparent` and then `fossil leaves --recompute` will help.. -- I am not a