Re: [fossil-users] RFC regarding short UUID for some command line use.

2015-03-08 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 08/03/15 06:48, Andy Bradford wrote:
 There  have  recently  been  some  changes  to  make  short  UUIDs  more
 prominent, however, I  think that new checkins should  still display the
 full UUID:
[---]
 Thoughts?

   None other than a simple I agree.

   /Jan


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] RFC regarding short UUID for some command line use.

2015-03-08 Thread Martin Gagnon
Le dimanche 8 mars 2015, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com a
écrit :

 On 08/03/15 06:48, Andy Bradford wrote:
  There  have  recently  been  some  changes  to  make  short  UUIDs  more
  prominent, however, I  think that new checkins should  still display the
  full UUID:
 [---]
  Thoughts?

None other than a simple I agree.

/Jan


I agree .

-- 
Martin G.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] RFC regarding short UUID for some command line use.

2015-03-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Joe Mistachkin on Sat, 07 Mar 2015 22:05:48 -0800:

 Personally, I agree.  I find having the abbreviated  UUID displayed in
 this particular context to be quite disconcerting.

What about  some of the  other command  line checkin contexts  that were
changed in [c62e94f8a3]:

$ fossil branch new test trunk
New branch: d4d5c24326
...
$ fossil merge --integrate test
$ fossil ci -m three
Closed: 5703dae21d
New_Version: da04545d2a

Thanks,

Andy
-- 
TAI64 timestamp: 400054fbf1a0


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] RFC regarding short UUID for some command line use.

2015-03-07 Thread Joe Mistachkin

Andy Bradford wrote:
 
 There  have  recently  been  some  changes  to  make  short  UUIDs  more
 prominent, however, I  think that new checkins should  still display the
 full UUID:
 

Personally, I agree.  I find having the abbreviated UUID displayed in this
particular context to be quite disconcerting.

--
Joe Mistachkin

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users