Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Michael Richter
On 13 August 2011 07:31, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as hidden on Windows, that would be good too). The ATTRIB command isn't working for you? -- Perhaps people don't believe this, but throughout all of the discussions of

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Aug 13, 2011, at 00:42 , Richard Hipp wrote: Most notably shell's glob ignores dotfiles, what makes them mostly a non-issue for me... And I find the _FOSSIL_ string particularly disturbing on listings. You know you can rename _FOSSIL_ as .fos, right? mv _FOSSIL_ .fos Should

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-13 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:46:18PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote: On 13 August 2011 07:31, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as hidden on Windows, that would be good too). The ATTRIB command isn't working for you? Let me add:

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-12 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: You know you can rename _FOSSIL_ as .fos, right? mv _FOSSIL_ .fos Should I make .fos the default While i'm all for Unix-style names, i think the name .fos might confuse more people than it would help, whereas

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-12 Thread Mike Meyer
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.pl wrote: On Aug 12, 2011, at 22:28 , Ben Summers wrote: If it has to be in the file system, I'd prefer one file to many. At the very least,

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-12 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:42:23PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: You know you can rename _FOSSIL_ as .fos, right? mv _FOSSIL_ .fos Should I make .fos the default? I think .fos is too random / short. .fossil would be fine as default on UNIX (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging

2011-08-12 Thread altufaltu
+1 - Original Message - From: Joerg Sonnenberger Sent: 08/13/11 05:01 AM To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Subject: Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ vs. .fos Was: New features for merging On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:42:23PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: You know you can rename