Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

2020-06-02 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 23:52 +0200, Michael C. Jaeger wrote: > Hi, > > right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance, > meaning how the administrator of an instance wants to set it to. Seems flexible. > However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses > or

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

2020-06-02 Thread Michael C. Jaeger
Hi, right now the idea is to have RAG per FOSSology server instance, meaning how the administrator of an instance wants to set it to. However, even this might be still inflexible, because "red" licenses or obligations are even not a good category for an entire organisation, but maybe per

Re: [FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

2020-06-02 Thread Jeremiah C. Foster
On Mon, 2020-06-01 at 10:51 +, Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via lists.fossology.org wrote: Hello All Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology Obligation feature Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a specific conditions and provides a

[FOSSology] Fossology Obligation feature improvement - export to csv and run on scanner results

2020-06-02 Thread Woźnicki Paweł - Partner Hurt via lists . fossology . org
Hello All Have you ever thought about improving functionality of Fossology Obligation feature Currently Fossology 3.8.0 allows to configure obligations on a specific conditions and provides a possibility to mark the findings in a proper way (RED, GREEN colour in the Doc report) but at the