On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Dragoslav Mitrinovic wrote:
I'll add my vote for license match highlighting. This was an extremely useful
feature in bsam, and for us it is the single most missed feature since the
transition to nomos. In fact, while I like nomos for its speed and easier
review
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Bob Gobeille bob.gobei...@hp.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Dragoslav Mitrinovic wrote:
I'll add my vote for license match highlighting. This was an extremely
useful feature in bsam, and for us it is the single most missed feature
since the
On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Dragoslav Mitrinovic wrote:
Speaking of new licenses, one thing we miss from bSAM are phrases. Thanks to
those phrases, bSAM was fairly good at detecting proprietary code, which is
important for instance when you are vetting code to be released as OSS.
Nomos
] On Behalf Of Dabrowski, Ivo
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 6:12 AM
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting (Bob Gobeille)
Here's my vote, too. BSAM as used in older versions of FOSSology
reveals matches (and derivations) easily.
Ivo
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
An: Dave McLoughlin
Cc: fossology@fossology.org
Betreff: Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting (Bob Gobeille)
Oh - multiple pages. That is painful.
Thanks for voting Dave.
Bob Gobeille
On Jul 28, 2011, at 4:43 PM, Dave McLoughlin wrote:
I'll cast my vote, highlighting is very important to us
-Original Message-
From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-
boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Dabrowski, Ivo
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 6:12 AM
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting (Bob Gobeille)
Here's my vote, too. BSAM as used in older versions
: Re: [FOSSology] License highlighting (Bob Gobeille)
Hello FOSSologists!
Thank you all for your votes. It's very important for us to hear from our
users
so we know how to prioritize the many features and requests we have on
our to-do list.
We REALY do listen and value your feedback. Keep
7 matches
Mail list logo
