Some of these issues have already been mentioned on this list recently,
but I wanted to summarize the items on our agenda for the board meeting
this weekend, Jan. 9-11, in San Francisco. These include:
*a recap of the fundraiser (this will obviously be very preliminary,
since the "thank you" por
2008/12/30 Woojin Kim :
> 1. Which one will discussion (or vote) for migration to CC-BY-SA be held,
> globally, or locally?
The plan is for a global vote to be organized on Meta.
> 2. If vote will be held globally, when will vote start?
We haven't finalized the timetable yet but I hope we can mo
A quick update: the "Thank You" banner is currently scheduled to stay
up until January 9, 4 PM PST. We're keeping it up a while longer in
part because it's the first work week after the holidays for many
people, and in part because it's an opportunity for chapters to get
some more visibility (we ma
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Delirium wrote:
> not the fault of a newbie
> complainer who was misled by the association.
>
Let's not categorize him negatively. We have no idea if he is a
"newbie" or not, he was "old" enough to realize that they weren't
really connected (evidenced by his subje
Delirium wrote:
> Tim Starling wrote:
>> I'm not seeing anything in that rant that contradicts the point I was
>> making. They might be different to Wikitravel in other ways, but they are
>> the same in terms of the lack of relevance of a content-related complaint
>> to foundation-l.
>>
>
> The
Delirium wrote:
> Tim Starling wrote:
>
>> They might be different to Wikitravel in other ways, but they are
>> the same in terms of the lack of relevance of a content-related complaint
>> to foundation-l.
>>
> The point I was making is that the fact that people thought a
> content-related
Hoi,
I have no involvement in Wikia, I am quite happy to say "poppycock" to you.
When the WMF has good relations with many organisations, I would credit the
WMF positively for this. Cooperation is very much what Wikis are about or
should be about. Given that it has been explicitly said that coope
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Delirium wrote:
> The point I was making is that the fact that people thought a
> content-related complaint about Wikia might be relevant to the
> foundation is the fault primarily of Wikia and the Foundation, and
> especially its entangled principals, not the fault
Tim Starling wrote:
> Delirium wrote:
>
>> Tim Starling wrote:
>>
>>> Brock Weller wrote:
>>>
>>>
Don't know how linked we still are with wikia...
>>> What do you mean "still"? Wikimedia has never been linked with Wikia to
>>> the extent where this top
-- Forwarded message --
From: Huji
To: translator...@lists.wikimedia.org, foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:23:22 +0330
Subject: Re: [Translators-l] New Privacy Policy
Dear translators, and dear foundation members,
I was just translating the new version of
Delirium wrote:
> Tim Starling wrote:
>> Brock Weller wrote:
>>
>>> Don't know how linked we still are with wikia...
>>>
>> What do you mean "still"? Wikimedia has never been linked with Wikia to
>> the extent where this topic might be relevant on foundation-l. It's no
>> more relevant than
11 matches
Mail list logo
