Thomas Dalton wrote:
E-mail, once
it let the military/academia, was a completely new thing, there wasn't
anything like it before (the closest thing was telegrams, which
charged by the word, could take a few hours to reach their destination
and couldn't have attachments).
Not even
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure if it'll catch on, because Google seems to have added so much
extraneous crap into the mix
Like replying in the middle of a message, not by quoting the original, but
by just editing the person's message to add
Hoi,
There was also Safari ... the message was modern browsers.. but this is
for the reference implementation Google will build. It was also demonstrated
that you can go as low as a command line tool for this..
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/5/30 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Like replying in the middle of a message, not by quoting the original, but
by just editing the person's message to add your question in the middle of
it. How pissed would you be if someone did that on your User talk page?
But
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
There was also Safari ... the message was modern browsers.. but this is
for the reference implementation Google will build. It was also demonstrated
that you can go as low as a command line tool for this..
2009/5/30 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
E-mail, once
it let the military/academia, was a completely new thing, there wasn't
anything like it before (the closest thing was telegrams, which
charged by the word, could take a few hours to reach their
2009/5/30 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure if it'll catch on, because Google seems to have added so much
extraneous crap into the mix
Like replying in the middle of a message, not by quoting the original, but
by
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
Like replying in the middle of a message, not by quoting the original,
but
by just editing the person's message to add your question in the middle
of
2009/5/30 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
I hated the way it didn't seem to
indicate what message you were replying to. For the most part, the
conversation had a linear structure, not a tree one. They would reply
to the
It's a great app,
look at it the other way! finally someone implemented LiquidThreads!
Cheers,
Domas
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/5/30 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
I hated the way it didn't seem to
indicate what message you were replying to. For the most
Hi all,
As promised on this list, the election committee has revisited the
election dates. The election pages have been updated to reflect new
dates for this election: July 28 through August 10. It is our hope
that this expanded voting time will serve to allay some of the
concerns raised
2009/5/30 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
A: What's your favorite color?
B: I like red
C: I like green
D: Red and green? Are you nuts? Blue is the best color of all?
A: I agree with B, red is definitely the nicest color.
C: But isn't the wavelength of green so much more asthetically pleasing?
Milos Rancic wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
It's not free software. The blog post says they intend to open source
the code. That generally means the code quality is so bad that they'd
be embarrassed to make it public, and would like to clean
2009/5/30 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org:
Milos Rancic wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
It's not free software. The blog post says they intend to open source
the code. That generally means the code quality is so bad that they'd
be
Hoi,
The license has been published here...
http://www.waveprotocol.org/patent-license
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/5/30 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
Milos Rancic wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
It's not free software. The blog post
Hoi,
One of the things that I really appreciate is the decision by Google to
create a reference implementation and the way they expect contributions to
the protocol to be accompanied by working code implemented as a patch for
the reference implementation. The reference implementation will as a
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:58 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/30 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
I don't get it... this is just MSN Messenger on steroids. It's a great
idea and if it works it should be really useful, but it isn't
world-changing and certainly isn't
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
That would be great, but wouldn't it also mean the death of Google and
pretty much any company which relies on web advertising to make money? How
do you make money off of P2P? Software and data license fees, I guess, but
is
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2009/5/29 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
Probably, some of you already saw that Google made something for which
I think that it will be the new form of the mainstream Internet
perception. You may read Slashdot article
Having just watched the talk/show/discussion/dancing, I agree
completely with Steve's comments on wikien-l:
On 29 May 2009, at 04:52, Steve Bennett wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_UyVmITiYQeurl=http%3A%2F%
2Fwave.google.com%2Ffeature=player_embedded
(See from about 31:00 onwards
2009/5/30 Judson Dunn cohes...@sleepyhead.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:58 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/30 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
I don't get it... this is just MSN Messenger on steroids. It's a great
idea and if it works it should be really useful, but
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Peter Coombe
thewub.w...@googlemail.com wrote:
The best description I've seen so far was FriendFeed... with benefits :-)
Right, it's not entirely new, which is I think why some people are
saying it isn't a big deal. The problem is, it's only not new for
people
Judson Dunn wrote:
I can't sell my luddite co-workers on the idea of a blog, or a
wiki, but this is more obviously approachable. For more normal
web users, there are obviously a lot of advanced uses as well.
Google Wave combines many concepts, such as mail discussion
threads, Twitter-like
2009/5/31 Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se:
The idea of showing diffs since the user last viewed the same
wave, is very similar to Flagged revisions.
How is it in any way like Flagged revisions?
___
foundation-l mailing list
How does Google Wave help the WMF achieve its goals?
Wikipedia has already become a dominant information source for the 1.5
billion people with Internet access thanks to Google.
We need to focus on getting Wikipedia to the 5.2 billion people who can't
access it.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:31 PM,
Given currently existing technology, and technology that we can reasonably
assume to be available within the next decade, how can the WMF best achieve
its goal of giving every person free access to our current best summary of
all human knowledge?
Consider that Google Translate has the best
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
Judson Dunn wrote:
I can't sell my luddite co-workers on the idea of a blog, or a
wiki, but this is more obviously approachable. For more normal
web users, there are obviously a lot of advanced uses as well.
Google Wave
It does sound like an excellent idea, but it does appear to require us
teaming up with Google, a hardware vendor, a software vendor (the OS of
course), a distributor and various governments that may or may not wish
they people having access to 'forbidden' information.
Assembling a chain of
29 matches
Mail list logo
