Erik Moeller wrote:
We're very thankful for Aaron's hard work on the FlaggedRevs extension
over the years; it's really almost entirely due to him that the
extension is now in active use in more than 20 wikis, with more than
1M pages patrolled in dewiki alone. That's an amazing achievement for
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:44 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2010/3/1 Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com:
I think it would be great if someone
on the project could put the initial tone aside, turn the other cheek,
and let everyone interested (and I know there are several) know what's
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious as to whether there's anything official behind this poll[1] on
en.wikipedia to simply turn on flagged revs in the form that the Germans
use it until the proposed enwiki changes are ready.
-Chad
[1]
Hoi,
The answer is already given ... When it is done. You have been informed with
the latest developments.. so you know the existing issues.
Thanks,
GerardM
2010/3/4 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
Erik Moeller wrote:
We're very thankful for Aaron's hard work on the FlaggedRevs extension
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
The answer is already given ... When it is done. You have been informed with
the latest developments.. so you know the existing issues.
That's normally the perfect answer, but the point of this discussion
is that
You've identified one of the criticisms of OCILLA/DMCA -- that it can be
easily abused by copyright holder to keep stuff offline. (This is what the
EFF is probably getting involved over). However, the proper response to that
is for the alleged infringer to request sanctions against the copyright
hm, wouldn't that be more a question that would suit more the board? It
seems a rather strategic one.
Lodewijk
2010/3/4 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com
Veronique, what would be the maximum we'd want to go with a reserve fund. I
know that with Army Emergency Relief for example, they get
Hi, Stephen. Thanks for making your point in a polite, low-drama way.
On 03/04/2010 05:58 AM, Stephen Bain wrote:
The answer is already given ... When it is done. You have been informed with
the latest developments.. so you know the existing issues.
That's normally the perfect answer,
William Pietri wrote:
Instead, I think the right approach is to put new software out there
frequently, so people can try it out for themselves and form their own
opinions of how close we are. Eventually, both the builders and the
community will agree that there's something worth shipping. And
On 03/03/2010 06:41 PM, Veronique Kessler wrote:
Hi,
The question of what is the right reserve amount is a common one. I've
hear of ranges from 0 to 3 months to 3 years. I agree that one year is
a good measure and that could be increased or decreased depending on a
variety of circumstances
On 4 March 2010 17:20, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Also, David Gerard made a suggestion about weekly updates that concretely
list the progress that's being made with regard to FlaggedRevs development.
William has mentioned there are software checkins, etc. in progress.
Even a list of
On 03/04/2010 09:20 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
William Pietri wrote:
Instead, I think the right approach is to put new software out there
frequently, so people can try it out for themselves and form their own
opinions of how close we are. Eventually, both the builders and the
community will
On 03/04/2010 09:59 AM, David Gerard wrote:
William has mentioned there are software checkins, etc. in progress.
Even a list of those would be excellent stuff.
This appears to be the best source:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/author/aaron
William
Even better is [1], since it includes commits to
FlaggedRevs other than Aaron's.
-Chad
[1]
http://mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki?path=/trunk/extensions/FlaggedRevs
On Mar 4, 2010 1:20 PM, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
On 03/04/2010 09:59 AM, David Gerard wrote:
William
William Pietri wrote:
On 03/04/2010 09:20 AM, MZMcBride wrote:
William Pietri wrote:
Instead, I think the right approach is to put new software out there
frequently, so people can try it out for themselves and form their own
opinions of how close we are. Eventually, both the
On 03/04/2010 10:57 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Purely as a point of fact it is simply inaccurate that the
20 implementations of flagged revs and patrolled edits
across the other wikies than English Wikipedia are
monolithically identical. I know this firsthand.
Sorry if I gave that
On 3 March 2010 20:53, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk wrote:
mid-2007 - - - - - $1m
end-2007 - - - - - $2.3m - - - - - $0.21m - - - - - 11 mos.
mid-2008 - - - - - $3m - - - - - ($0.32m) - - - - - 9 mos.
end-2008 - - - - - $6.7m - - - - - $0.43m - - - - - 15 mos.
mid-2009 - - - - -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote:
we think there are some interface changes are
going to improve both the user experience and the value of the enwiki
trial.
Why did it take this request from enwiki to have the UX aspect of
flagged
On 03/04/2010 01:45 PM, Mike.lifeguard wrote:
Why did it take this request from enwiki to have the UX aspect of
flagged revisions taken seriously?
This has been one of the main complaints about the implementation since
day zero. All other complaints I've heard have been regarding the idea,
William Pietri wrote:
On 03/04/2010 10:57 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Purely as a point of fact it is simply inaccurate that the
20 implementations of flagged revs and patrolled edits
across the other wikies than English Wikipedia are
monolithically identical. I know this firsthand.
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Dan Rosenthal wrote:
You've identified one of the criticisms of OCILLA/DMCA -- that it can be
easily abused by copyright holder to keep stuff offline. (This is what the
EFF is probably getting involved over). However, the proper response to that
is for the alleged
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Dan Rosenthal wrote:
You've identified one of the criticisms of OCILLA/DMCA -- that it can be
easily abused by copyright holder to keep stuff offline. (This is what the
EFF is
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious as to whether there's anything official behind this poll[1] on
en.wikipedia to simply turn on flagged revs in the form that the Germans
use it until the proposed enwiki changes are ready.
Is it even technically
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Chad innocentkil...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious as to whether there's anything official behind this poll[1] on
en.wikipedia to simply turn on flagged revs in the form that the Germans
use it
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.ukwrote:
presumably, it gets a little tighter right before the fundraisers.
In 2009 it was tightest end of september/beginning of october. In October
and November, revenues exceeded expenses.
That's a great chart (*) by the
25 matches
Mail list logo
