On 13 January 2012 09:45, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 January 2012 14:22, Bastien Guerry b...@altern.org wrote:
I still expect some of them to react in a way that will make them think
twice before participating to an upload project. But maybe that's just
me being
On 2 November 2011 00:40, Yann Forget yan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Indeed, you are right. This is a great addition to Commons.
I am going through it now, and I have questions.
In some cases, I found that there are better quality images than the
ones we have.
Where do they come from?
While I am impressed by everyone's ability to turn this into yet another
discussion of the image filter, how about if we don't do that just this
once? :-) This is the blog post that the WMF published regarding the
development:
On 2 November 2011 13:54, Kul Wadhwa kwad...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2) A conspiracy to push Wikipedia at the expense of the sister projects
In regards to #2, there is no conspiracy here. We've been quite open
about this. Yes, there is more of an emphasis on Wikipedia but it goes
back to
Hi all,
Since it hasn't really been mentioned, I just wanted to point out that this
image, never before available to the public in high resolution, was uploaded
to Commons as a result of our ongoing cooperative efforts with the US
National Archives (i.e., my residency). Its copyright status was
