.
Does anyone know what kind of experiments we're talking about?
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
to the point where it's quite hard to edit.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone from the Foundation confirm that they're looking into
it? It's getting to the point where it's quite hard to edit.
Tim's investigating
and Product Development, Wikimedia Foundation
Erik, I've just tried loading some of the pages I was having problems
with. They're loading well, and preview is working well again. Many
thanks to everyone who helped to fix this.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing
=marshalsea
The byline apart, it's disturbing that someone might be conned into
paying $77 for it, when they can download it for free.
Sarah
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:24 PM, RYU Cheol rch...@gmail.com wrote:
You can find that at this link.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/wikibooks-wikimedia
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Achal Prabhala aprabh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 23 February 2012 12:58 AM, Sarah wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Achal Prabhalaaprabh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank you Tom, and Sarah, for your very helpful explanations - they are
extremely
=Wikipedia:No_original_researcholdid=478167288#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Achal Prabhala aprabh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Tom, and Sarah, for your very helpful explanations - they are
extremely useful.
There's a discussion on at the reliable sources notice board, for instance,
which highlights some of the interpretive problems
that the views are not sufficiently well-represented by
reliable sources; or that the reliable sources, even if peer-reviewed,
belong to the wrong field.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
One more, but forgot her name and too lazy to search. German females
in discussion on German Wikipedia should be also checked.
Up to now, all females from US (four of them) are in favor of filter
(though, Sarah just
biscuit on the [[Soggy biscuit]]
article.
Well it was quickly taken down!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Soggy_biscuit#Removing_the_article_image
But at least we have plenty of other images of people in sexually deviant
situations with their faces shown. :P
-Sarah You can't always get what you
,
nationality, sexuality or other demographics that probably would feel the
same way.
It's funny that you just turned this into a think about the children
feminism thing. I guess in your eyes I'm a failed feminist. ;)
-Sarah
Who learned more about sexuality from Madonna then she ever did from school
to a number of people on this list): I
don't need anyone, of any gender, questioning my feminism. It's as insulting
as being called a censor. There are no rule books.
But if there was... ;-) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Feminine_Mystique
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia
here in the US in the future.
I encourage people interested in developing these types of ideas further to
stop by gender gap-l as well!
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap But it's great to
see these projects developing elsewhere, of course :D
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership
As the British Museum.
Hehehehe.
--Sarah (Stierch)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
If originals don't have copyright, how can The Israel Museum claim any
copyright for scans which lack originality?[1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v
ASK THE NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY.
Damn. Joke fail.
-Sarah
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
As the British Museum.
Hehehehe.
--Sarah (Stierch)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:27 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
If originals don't have copyright
.
And if i had a dollar for the mentioning of Germans I'd be rich. And here
people are arguing about lack of coverage about other projects and languages.
So tired of the Us vs. Them mentality.
I'd rather talk about GMOs, JFK, Creationism and the end of the world next
yearat this point.
Sarah
this subject. I'm going to go back to thinking of
ways to have more women and men create better sexual content for Commons as
a project and go attend my Feminists, Technology and Museums conference.
-Sarah (Missvain, SarahStierch)
Who would move to Berlin in a heartbeat to be an unpaid intern
Hi everyone,
I can't remember - was user gender a question in the survey?
I don't remember...
Thanks :)
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for Wikimedia http://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah
Thanks Beria! :) A shame, it would have been really fascinating to see if
there was a gender gap in this matter.
-Sarah
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
No.
You can see all the questions here:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_filter_referendum
and
belief systems around the world and within small communities.
-Sarah (Stierch)
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:32 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.comwrote:
do you propose questions like the following?
knowledge level o a-level o university o...
raceo african
know David Shankbone did some
good ones, but for some reason it has been limited. Adding some
original videos to our articles (adding them to Wikipedia articles,
supplied by Wikinews) would be very attractive to readers, I think.
Sarah
___
foundation-l
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:34, Andrew Lih andrew@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:02, Andrew Lih andrew@gmail.com wrote:
of Wikipedia principles. Wikis depend on eventualism: given an
infinite timeline
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 13:10, Andrew Lih andrew@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:34, Andrew Lih andrew@gmail.com wrote:
And, in Wikipedia's crowdsourced way, potentially a re-oriented,
mobilized Wikinews
of it. There is no inherent POV
issue there, so long as we observe NPOV, just as we do with text.
Primary sources are already allowed, so long as used descriptively and
not interpreted.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
is obviously very off-putting. So
we risk limiting our reach by not dealing with it.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
lifestyles or are open minded to what
other people do in their bedrooms. Some don't even live in America. I think
you need to rethink your statements before you go around accusing
supporters, including women, of this referendum as sexually dysfunctional
conservatives.
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership
opening it.
I work in an educational environment (a museum institution, which has
exhibits on sexuality, gender, etc) and I can't even look at these articles
at work, take that as you will.
Sarah
who is totally grossed out by that photo on the vagina article,
gahhh, surely she can't be the only
a study on that.
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising
media content to all. It acts as a common repository for the
various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation.
However, I am beginning to think that Commons might have to change it's
scope since educational media has evolved to encompass what everyone
believes is every free image on earth.
-Sarah
, appreciate clarifications. Wikipedia and
related sister projects are bad at explaining things, so it's always nice to
have kind folks like you explain things to some of us (again!) :).
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 5:23 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 September 2011 22:18, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
I really wish people would read previous discussions.
Don't be passive aggressive ;)
I think it's an entirely reasonable statement, given what
of upcoming events!
Members of the community write this publication, so if you have
contributions to make, please participate. Translations encouraged.
GLAM on!
Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives
for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural artistic research advising.*
--
http
and Wikimania 2011
providing food and the venue.
-Sarah
--
GLAMWIKI Partnership Ambassador for the Wikimedia
Foundationhttp://www.glamwiki.org
Wikipedian-in-Residence, Archives of American
Arthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch
and
Sarah Stierch Consulting
*Historical, cultural
to Commercial Drive ;-))
-Sarah
Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)
On Jul 29, 2011, at 6:08 AM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
From the perspective of Wikimedia Canada, this sounds exciting. Many
of us believe that work with the First Nations
free to email me directly, again, right now I am unable to move quickly
in any major projects due to my already big work load, but, I'm hoping that
this will be large part of my career work as an advocate for Native rights,
a scholar, and an open source-lover.
-Sarah
[[w:en:User:SarahStierch]]
On Wed
of that language in order to continue our mission to
disseminate knowledge on a worldwide scale.
-Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
.
To be honest, your email was a slap in the face. Thank you again for sharing
your thoughts, I take your letter very seriously.
-Sarah
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Maria Alameda m-alamed...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hello all
I usually don't comment on mailing lists but a colleague of mine
to me. It doesn't seem horribly
unlikely that Sarah is, if not alone, then among a very small group of
academics studying the intersection of Native Americans and Wikimedia
projects.
Were her descriptions of the challenges facing Native American
communities inaccurate?
Are you aware
primary
sources. It would make our articles significantly more interesting and
reader-friendly, and would tie in directly with efforts to record oral
histories.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 22:08, Chris Lee theornamental...@gmail.com wrote:
It lasted only a minute. I apologize for the urgent email sent out; wanted
to make sure that it was taken care of
What was it that lasted only a minute, Chris?
___
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 21:03, Marc A. Pelletier m...@uberbox.org wrote:
On 10/06/2011 5:55 PM, Sarah wrote:
[...] that the software is actively inviting all accounts that meet
those requirements, it means we're alerting all the socks that they're
able to vote. They might otherwise not even
Also, looking at the elections e-mail again, it links to a page that,
so far as I can see, doesn't tell people where to go to vote, except
for those most active on meta.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
, one that's obviously mine from the name.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
in pt.wiki)
_
I also received two invitations to vote, including to a little-used
alternative account, one that is obviously mine from the name. This
suggests among other things that the minimum voting requirements must
be pretty low.
Sarah
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:49, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Sarah -- the voting requirements are here --
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Board_elections/2011/en#Requirements
300 edits, 20 recent ones -- the requirements were roughly halved from
the last elections. There's
invitations to quite a few people.
I can't see how it benefits the project to have multiple accounts
voting that only need to have made 300 edits and 20 recent ones, and a
kind bot that reminds them of all the eligible account names. We're
shooting ourselves in the foot with this, surely.
Sarah
On 10 June 2011 22:19, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received two invitations to vote -- also both at the same e-mail
address -- so all I'd have to do now (if it were a user name that
didn't make it obvious it was mine) is go somewhere else to vote. And
given how low the voting
the software is reminding them of.
This is just not a good idea.
Sarah
2011/6/11, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com:
On 10 June 2011 22:19, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
I've received two invitations to vote -- also both at the same e-mail
address -- so all I'd have to do now (if it were a user name
was extremely good at exploiting that
tendency. That's the long and short of it.
The one good thing that could come of it is that we recognize in
future when we're doing it again, but that will only happen if we
remember and discuss it, and try to heal the divisions he caused or
made worse.
Sarah
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 02:46, Samuel Klein meta...@gmail.com wrote:
Those who toil away in the depths of style guide subpages and cite
templates should be reminded from time to time of the tremendous
impact their work has on the rest of the world...
Speaking of which, David Gerard has just
despite its faults, [Wikipedia] does promote solid
values for its writers, including precise citations, accurate
research, editing and revision.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 19:50, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
Identity of Anonymous Wikipedia Editors Not Protected by First Amendment
http://ecommercelaw.typepad.com/ecommerce_law/2011/05/identity-of-anonymous-wikipedia-editors-not-protected-by-first-amendment.html
Nothing
of
Wikipedians if asked by a British court because of these injunctions?
Did he actually say that, and if so when did the Foundation decide this?
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
complaints, but no
figures are given.
Some hard stats -- X number of complaints concerning Y number of
articles within time T, of which Z were actionable -- would be very
useful.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 13:33, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 22/05/2011 19:32, Sarah wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:00, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 22/05/2011 11:58, Chris Keating wrote:
Also rather interestingly, it appears that a Scottish newspaper has
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 20:19, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
It is not up to us to decide that something is private. If it's been
published, then it is public.
If it's been published in a reliable source, than it's useable in our project.
But not everything that's usable has to be used.
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 14:33, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Sarah wrote:
I'm increasingly wondering whether we should be hosting any BLPs, because
these are often difficult decisions to make -- at which point there is
legitimate public interest in a person's private life
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 15:14, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Sarah wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 14:33, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I think anyone who has been in the BLP trenches has had the same thought.
The reality is that an encyclopedia without a Barack Obama article
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 16:01, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
As to the comments from MZMcBride and Sarah, I would like to see a
significantly higher minimal level of notability for BLPs. In the past few
years of working with the Arbitration Committee, I have seen literally
thousands
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On 20 May 2011 17:37, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.com wrote:
It won't be too long before a reputable news source covers the whole issue -
or indeed a British Parliamentarian raises it under parliamentary privilege.
I'm thinking it will be interesting to see how Twitter's position is
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:01, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
2) Regarding Our BLP policy has worked., that's a fascinating
argument that the super-injunction *is* worthwhile. If Wikipedia
defines verifiability in terms of major media sources, and the
super-injunction inhibits
Could someone from the Foundation or one of the developers say whether this
is being looked into?
Sarah
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:28, Thomas Morton
morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote:
Yeh, that was when it was turned on. So maybe :)
On 18 May 2011 19:27, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:59, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone from the Foundation or one of the developers say whether this
is being looked into?
I've requested an assessment of the current situation
any idea why it's happening, or whether it's being looked into. I would link
to the discussion, but I can't get the page to open.
Does anyone on the list have information about it?
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:20, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
The English Wikipedia has been experiencing painfully slow load times over
the last few days, and lots of error messages when trying to save, to the
point where the site has become difficult to use. There's discussion about
anything.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
way Wikipedia interprets fair use. It's a situation
people have tried to draw attention to for years, with no success.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:36, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/5/2011 6:08:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
bnewst...@wikimedia.org writes:
Another quick note on the Movement Communications Manager posting that we
are hoping to fill at WMF. We have a number of applicants, but very,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:42, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
I understood that they wanted someone who was ideally *not* a native
English speaker. That was something that concerned me when I read it,
because it looked as if the intention was to disadvantage applicants
who had
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 13:07, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
Is not a Bias Sarah. Anyone can apply, but they have to know english (if not
as 1º language as 2º one) and another language (if english is the 1º one).
If this person is american, chinese, brazilian or african (i imagine
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 13:29, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 April 2011 15:17, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 13:07, Béria Lima berial...@gmail.com wrote:
Is not a Bias Sarah. Anyone can apply, but they have to know english (if
not
as 1º language as 2º
they were born in a country that did
not make them a native English speaker. That is discrimination. Try to
imagine an ad that said: Ideally your native language is not Urdu.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 16:30, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 April 2011 23:24, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, I understand that. But my question is whether an employment ad
in America could lawfully say (or imply), Ideally your native
language is not Urdu
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 16:53, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 April 2011 18:36, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 16:30, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
* Should you have been consulted?
But here we see something that happens on this list a lot
website that caters to lots of different needs
and skill levels, so there's a limit to how simple these processes can
be made.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
in many
ways. But it can go too far. The thing is, you can't turn it on and
off as needed.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
endless inquiries from
new editors to the effect that guideline X says I can do this, but
I'm being told I can't.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 16:45, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Sarah wrote:
What is the problem with allowing editors to do this kind of thing
manually -- open AfDs and RfCs, and the like? Why does there always
have to be a template, just as a matter of interest?
Well, you hit the answer
-putting to new people too.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
the sarcasm in that. I thought it was a genuine
compliment about the intelligent discussion on this list. If it was a
personal attack that puts things in a different light.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
that part of things was just a misunderstanding.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 23:14, Dan Rosenthal swatjes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 3, 2011, at 1:02 AM, Virgilio A. P. Machado wrote:
intelectual
*cough*
-Dan
I hope the next time I write in Portuguese, the only mistake I make is
a typo! :)
___
is: what reason is there to suppose that's
meaningful in terms of numbers of people? It can only be the basis of
concern if we have reason to attribute meaning to it.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 11:51, Isabell Long isabell...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:33:32PM +0100, Phil Nash wrote:
We've not had SUL (Single User Login) for that long, and my impression is
that this will tend to inflate the number of registered accounts compared
with the number
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 09:10, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been using it on our work intranet for new wikis. It's gained
unsolicited positive comment. Vector looks nice.
Do we know how many editors still use Monobook?
Sarah
is that it highlights the need to
attract new editors, based on some doubtful figures, without
addressing that experienced editors are becoming disillusioned.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
be astonished by the very small number of people who
created, wrote and maintained this project. And every time one of
those people leaves, real damage is inflicted on Wikipedia's future.
I wish the Foundation would focus on nurturing those people. The
difference that would make would be truly amazing.
Sarah
User Y for a while.
Did the study do anything to correlate number of accounts with number of people?
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 17:27, Sarah slimvir...@gmail.com wrote:
It says: Between 2005 and 2007, newbies started having real trouble
successfully joining the Wikimedia community. Before 2005 in the
English Wikipedia, nearly 40% of new editors would still be active a
year after their first
on that survey alone.
Sarah
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
served. The list will open on Wednesday, March 23 at
22:00 UTC, and will remain open for seven days. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CREDO
Feel free to add your name even if you're lower on the list than the
400th, in case people ahead of you aren't eligible.
Good luck!
Sarah
http
94 matches
Mail list logo
