On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 1:08 AM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The Right Honourable Mr Godwin:
In the world outside this mailing list, the fact that I'm responding to this
extent to these criticisms would itself be taken as proof of transparency,
not disproof.
For me there is no reason to believe that Mr. Godwin is a good lawyer.
If he receives a formal (blah-blah) correct take-down-notice he will
take OFFICE ACTION.
It was clearly un-lawful to take down the TU Munich logo which isn't
protectable according German copyright law but WMF has done so.
It
On 3 June 2010 00:13, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
It was clearly un-lawful to take down the TU Munich logo which isn't
protectable according German copyright law but WMF has done so.
Of course it is lawful for the WMF to remove something from a WMF
site. It may not be legally
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
For me there is no reason to believe that Mr. Godwin is a good lawyer.
If he receives a formal (blah-blah) correct take-down-notice he will
take OFFICE ACTION.
It was clearly un-lawful to take down the TU Munich logo
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
For me there is no reason to believe that Mr. Godwin is a good lawyer.
If he receives a formal (blah-blah) correct take-down-notice he will
take OFFICE ACTION.
It was clearly un-lawful to take down the TU Munich logo
Hoi,
The question is not so much what you believe but very much the reputation Mr
Godwin has. In my appreciation he has an excellent reputation based on the
many relevant jobs that he has had in the past. There are not many people
who are associated with a law that is named after them.
When you
Klaus Graf writes:
For me there is no reason to believe that Mr. Godwin is a good lawyer.
I certainly don't require that you believe I'm a good lawyer. I'd be a very
poor lawyer indeed, however, if I invited publishers to embroil us in
expensive copyright lawsuits that we might not win when
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
What harm do you foresee in replacing deleted pages with a declaration like
YouTube uses, This Video has been deleted
based on a copyright claim by The Disney Corporation ? And then an
extension of If you believe this is public
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
What harm do you foresee in replacing deleted pages with a declaration like
YouTube uses, This Video has been deleted
based on a copyright claim by The Disney
from the take-down notice.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com
To: wjhon...@aol.com
Cc: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, Jun 2, 2010 5:24 pm
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Office action
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote
-Original Message-
From: Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, Jun 2, 2010 4:54 pm
Subject: [Foundation-l] Office action
It is a shame that WMF hasn't a policy of TRANSPARENCY regarding
office actions. The right of the community
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Finally as it seems to be necessary to understand Latin in order to read
your rant, I want to use that language with Cave canum. What I know of
that language is thanks to those fine Gauls immortalised by Underzo and
Goscinny. Brassica is translated in apekool in my
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:56 AM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
Do we really want every contributor to be an expert in the copyright laws of
any particular nation that might have a company exerting some obscure claim?
We want every contributor who is going to be submitting non-original
content
On 3 June 2010 00:13, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
For me there is no reason to believe that Mr. Godwin is a good lawyer.
If he receives a formal (blah-blah) correct take-down-notice he will
take OFFICE ACTION.
It was clearly un-lawful to take down the TU Munich logo which
On 3 June 2010 00:54, Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it is correct that I will comply with a DMCA (or equivalent) takedown
notice. In this respect, I'm like just about every lawyer everywhere who
represents a service provider. Perhaps they are all bad lawyers, but at
least I'm in
15 matches
Mail list logo
