So if the incentive to improve it will end and the people who contribute
will switch over.. you have nothing to complain about, because the quote
unquote imposed skin will die out. End of problem.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:55 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Brandon Harris wrote:
This
On 3 August 2010 02:32, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 8/2/2010 6:12 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
A lot of the complaints I heard regarding the Vector rollout were based in
the fact that the Wikimedia Usability team has subverted and bastardized the
term usability in an attempt to
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:43 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Job adverts? Really?. Site notice is for critical stuff (fund raising,
servers about to explode) even if you play with the notice to only
appear ~%10 of the time.
Personally I was quite pleased to see it.
It can only add to the
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Bod Notbod bodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:43 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Job adverts? Really?. Site notice is for critical stuff (fund raising,
servers about to explode) even if you play with the notice to only
appear ~%10 of the
Apparently long-time Wikimedia contributors are also far more sensitive
to Foundation imposition of /less/ visual clutter as well, judging by
the reaction to the Vector rollout. Perhaps we could just say that
long-term Wikimedia contributors are just more sensitive ;)
Ryan Kaldari
On 8/2/10
While I appreciate the comments about people being overly sensitive, I
do think it is still true that we should avoid unnecessary clutter.
With that in mind, I would like to mention that I don't really like
the big empty box approach. On my screen it looks like the banner is
about 3.5 times the
Er, I mean: I think it would feel less imposing and more friendly to
have a smaller banner THAT ran longer.
Silly typo.
-Robert Rohde
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Apparently long-time Wikimedia contributors are also far more sensitive
to Foundation imposition of /less/ visual clutter as well, judging by
the reaction to the Vector rollout. Perhaps we could just say that
long-term
Ryan Kaldari wrote:
Apparently long-time Wikimedia contributors are also far more sensitive
to Foundation imposition of /less/ visual clutter as well, judging by
the reaction to the Vector rollout. Perhaps we could just say that
long-term Wikimedia contributors are just more sensitive ;)
A
On 8/2/2010 6:12 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
A lot of the complaints I heard regarding the Vector rollout were based in
the fact that the Wikimedia Usability team has subverted and bastardized the
term usability in an attempt to impose purely aesthetic choices on the
broader community.
in an attempt to impose purely aesthetic choices on the
broader community.
Impose? You know it can be turned off, right?
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 8/2/2010 6:12 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
A lot of the complaints I heard regarding the Vector
Job adverts? Really?. Site notice is for critical stuff (fund raising,
servers about to explode) even if you play with the notice to only
appear ~%10 of the time. Central notice even more so. For less
important stuff where you want to contact the community there is
[[MediaWiki:Watchlist-details]]
On 29 July 2010 22:43, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
Job adverts? Really?. Site notice is for critical stuff (fund raising,
servers about to explode) even if you play with the notice to only
appear ~%10 of the time. Central notice even more so. For less
important stuff where you want to
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 5:43 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
advantage of not putting English ads on the Italian (substitute almost
every non english wikipedia of your choice) wikipedia.
We actually have translations of the notice in 40 languages already
and more are coming in as we speak.
14 matches
Mail list logo
