Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-20 Thread Andrew Gray
2009/2/19 Mark Williamson : > I still hold the crown on Wikipedia-l. Whatever happened to that list, > anyways? Most of the people wanting to have abtruse cross-project theological debates just took it to foundation-l :-) -- - Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk ___

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Cary Bass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wikipedia-l is still a good place to discuss Wikipedia related issues regardless of language. I've seen some interesting discussions take place there over the last couple of months. It's still quite useful. Cary Mark Williamson wrote: > I still hold

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Mark Williamson wrote: > I still hold the crown on Wikipedia-l. Whatever happened to that list, > anyways? Pretty much no decisions are made at the "Wikipedia" level. They're either made at the foundation level or the individual project one. ___

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Mark Williamson
I still hold the crown on Wikipedia-l. Whatever happened to that list, anyways? skype: node.ue 2009/2/19 Nathan : > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > >> >> >> >> That's the result of having to write a master's thesis! >> >> Actually, I think that list is very positive - we

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Nathan wrote: > Thomas Dalton 753 GerardM 738 David Gerard 450 Ray Saintonge 405 > Anthony 403 Milos Rancic 381 geni 359 Anthere 323 Dan Rosenthal 316 > Chad 311 Nathan 283 Mark Williamson 276 Andrew Whitworth 273 Geoffrey > Plourde 253 Erik Moeller 22

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
> Thomas Dalton 753 GerardM 738 David Gerard 450 Ray Saintonge 405 > Anthony 403 Milos Rancic 381 geni 359 Anthere 323 Dan Rosenthal 316 > Chad 311 Nathan 283 Mark Williamson 276 Andrew Whitworth 273 Geoffrey > Plourde 253 Erik Moeller 229 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen 224 effe iets anders

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, I am glad that you did not count the number of times that I blogged on one of my blogs. Have a read and tell me where you think I make most sense ... http://ulltmategerardm.blogspot.com http://omegawiki.blogspot.com http://extensiontesting.blogspot.com/ Thanks, GerardM 2009/2/19 Nathan

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/2/19 Nathan : > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > >> >> >> >> That's the result of having to write a master's thesis! >> >> Actually, I think that list is very positive - we have 25 people all >> posting at least an average of 5 posts a day. That's a large, active >> comm

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Nathan
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Dalton wrote: > > > > That's the result of having to write a master's thesis! > > Actually, I think that list is very positive - we have 25 people all > posting at least an average of 5 posts a day. That's a large, active > community. 753 emails is a frighte

Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/2/19 Nathan : > Sometime in the past year I stopped posting the top posters list because it > was seen as not useful and perhaps encouraging the type of behavior it was, > in fact, meant to discourage. Even so, I thought I might post this special > edition of top posters. The numbers come from

[Foundation-l] Top posters, special edition

2009-02-19 Thread Nathan
Sometime in the past year I stopped posting the top posters list because it was seen as not useful and perhaps encouraging the type of behavior it was, in fact, meant to discourage. Even so, I thought I might post this special edition of top posters. The numbers come from Erik Zachte's list page, a