Hoi,
An important thread has been derailed by an off topic comment. For your
information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides whatever came before. This
whole notion has no relevance to me as a consequence. I get hundreds
Gerard Meijssen, 14/06/2010 13:44:
For me KTHX is
one such, the top rated result makes it a radio station and it took me some
time to find that it is likely to mean Ok, thanks.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kthx
Time: 1 s?
Nemo
___
foundation-l
Sorry for going off-topic again in an off-topic thread of a really
interesting on-topic thread..
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) nemow...@gmail.comwrote:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kthx
Time: 1 s?
If you don't count the probability that one gets stuck on Wikipedia
On 06/14/2010 04:44 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
For your
information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides whatever came before. This
whole notion has no relevance to me as a consequence. I get hundreds of
mails and
kthx
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
An important thread has been derailed by an off topic comment. For your
information, and for the somanyth time, top posting comes easy when you use
a modern tool like GMAIL. It automatically hides
I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one that I find to be much more important to our projects.
Can all of us go back over there and stop talking about this? Kthx.
m.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.com wrote:
kthx
On
Mark Williamson wrote:
I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one that I find to be much more important to our projects.
Can all of us go back over there and stop talking about this? Kthx.
I agree. I made my point. You either get it, or you don't.
Yours,
Hoi,
I agree, I replied and made my point, You either accept it or you don't.
Thanks,
GerardM
PS I get it.
On 14 June 2010 22:21, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Williamson wrote:
I'm very disappointed that this discussion has continued at the
expense of one
It is actually gratifying to notice that you actually
do know how to remove parts of a message you are
replying to, which aren't necessary for comprehension.
Thank you very much.
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
___
foundation-l mailing list
