Personal view:
Nice idea, and would certainly be popular with the arbitrators - but it
needs something to replace it that's slightly more complex than a
dispute resolution noticeboard. It's nice to see the WMF taking over
some of the more unpleasant roles that ArbCom does, but we then have no
.
WikipediaLocalized? WikiDetails? WikipediaExpanded? WikipediaSuppliment?
On 3/20/2012 5:24 PM, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
From: David Goodmandgge...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Cc:r...@slmr.com
Subject: Re
But what to call it? Wikipedia2 doesn't have much flavor.
WikipediaLocalized? WikiDetails? WikipediaExpanded? WikipediaSuppliment?
On 3/20/2012 5:24 PM, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
From: David Goodmandgge...@gmail.com
What I suggest is a '''Wikipedia Two'' - an
Great now if only that where true. With the vote being 8:4 and my
understanding of the situation I am fairly certain it is not. The editors
with a medical background on the committee did not support the ban of Will.
As this controversy surrounded medical content their positions should be
given
James, perhaps a more appropriate place to have this conversation is either
at the English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee noticeboard, or alternately
if you want a different audience, the Wiki-en-L mailing list. Your issue
is project-specific and there are more appropriate venues for you to
On 02/22/12 6:04 PM, David Goodman wrote:
There are many subjects in which there would be multiple schools of
thought with little agreement; anyone following book reviews in the
humanities or social sciences or even some of the sciences would know
the intensity with which the highest level
to be exempt from this kind of academic
discourse. We owe it to our readers to provide a clear and fair-minded
presentation of these differences.
Isn't that what David is saying? That if we allowed partisans to hold sway
by virtue of their expertise in the subject we are not going to get a fair
minded
to be exempt from this kind of academic
discourse. We owe it to our readers to provide a clear and fair-minded
presentation of these differences.
Isn't that what David is saying? That if we allowed partisans to hold
sway
by virtue of their expertise in the subject we are not going to get a
fair
been given to understand
that the quality of the peer review process varies greatly. About 10
years back, I was briefly involved in an attempt to develop an online
peer reviewed publications infrastructure. This was one of our
concerns - is it better to have 10 second tier subject matter experts
that person(s) had a vested
interest in the subject of that content. Whether peer reviewed or
evaluated by a subject matter expert - printed matter has always had
some sort of editorial process.
That isn't to say we should necessarily trust the motives of that
editorial process. Propaganda
I was one of the initial subject editors at Citizendium. One of its
key problems was the poor choice of subject matter experts. The
selection of which people to trust was ultimately in the hands of the
founder, and he was unduly impressed by formal academic credentials
without concerning himself
- is it better to have 10 second tier subject matter experts vote on
whether or not to publish an article or rely solely on the opinion of
one first tier expert (who might bitterly detest the author of the work
under scrutiny for reasons not at all connected with the quality of the
article). Perhaps a better
Bauderfredb...@fairpoint.net
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Subject: Re: Vendetta?
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
42740.66.243.192.69.1323974656.squir...@webmail.fairpoint.net
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
It isn't so
, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:37:58 -0700 (MST)
From: Fred Bauderfredb...@fairpoint.net
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Vendetta?
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID
It isn't so much about having my stuff edited as it is that there seems
to be a mindset among en.wp editors that stuff needs to be deleted
unless they personally think it is important. We have a virtually
infinite space in which to write and add to the body of knowledge, so
why act as though
In other words, Wikipedia does not have space for what you find
interesting. Sorry.
On 12/15/11, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
It isn't so much about having my stuff edited as it is that there seems
to be a mindset among en.wp editors that stuff needs to be deleted
unless they
In other words, Wikipedia does not have space for what you find
interesting. Sorry.
A summary of generally accepted knowledge is a foundation for creative
new information. Wikipedia is a tool, a tool meant to be used and
transcended.
Fred
___
http://www.benchmarkcs.com/hello.php?html143
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On 10/4/2011 9:04 AM, foundation-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
issue of originality.
The Qimron case is completely irrelevant with regard to the copyright
of the images. ?It is a case about the*text*.
If WMF wants to copy*the text* of the scrolls, I don't think anyone
is going
An entertaining discussion - let's see if I understand the essence of
the thread...
Facts:
High resolution photos (of the Dead Sea Scrolls) were recently released
under an Israeli copyright.
(Obviously this does not constitute copyright of the scrolls themselves.)
A great deal of technical and
--
Sent from ATT's Wireless network using Yahoo! Mail
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Don�t be frigid, my sweet!.
http://naaldendraadborduuratelier.nl/links.php?omaSID=404
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
set a branch in new delhi india
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Kimberly Brown
310 310-5477-Cell
301 622-2469-Home
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
wtf?
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:05 PM, kometbr...@netzero.net
kometbr...@netzero.net wrote:
Kimberly Brown
310 310-5477-Cell
301 622-2469-Home
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM, C F shma...@gmail.com wrote:
wtf?
Sometimes people send blank e-mails by accident, it's best to just ignore them.
--
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
With 2 personal phone numbers? Nevermind it seems that one of them has
the wrong area code (although I might be wrong), which suggests that
the phone numbers were the only things intended for that email.
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Casey Brown li...@caseybrown.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, C F shma...@gmail.com wrote:
With 2 personal phone numbers? Nevermind it seems that one of them has
the wrong area code (although I might be wrong), which suggests that
the phone numbers were the only things intended for that email.
Those are probably just their
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 2:23 AM, C F shma...@gmail.com wrote:
With 2 personal phone numbers? Nevermind it seems that one of them has
the wrong area code (although I might be wrong), which suggests that
the phone numbers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry to be blunt but, Why is this question so Wikipedia-centric? Other
projects have proved ideal testing grounds for usability and such.
Because Wikipedia is the cash cow.
I was going to rant, but it became too depressing because it wouldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Issue 1: The official and public description of CheckUser lays out a
transparent process for justifying when and how it may be used. In practice,
it is often used in secret and quick back door process. First issue is
the misrepresentation to the
2009/10/27 Mike.lifeguard mike.lifegu...@gmail.com:
You are a long way from proving your point, but I would encourage you to
make that request on the talk page of the CheckUser policy page on
English Wikipedia so it can be pointed out that while there is a public
request process, most
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Gregory Kohs thekoh...@gmail.com wrote:
It strikes me that this is something that Creative Commons or other
organizations with Godwin-like attorneys should be aggressively
pursuing, but we didn't hear from any of them in the original thread,
did we? Mike,
Dear Sir,
I received your email. I am pleased to know that you are interested in this
area.
I give you the way to invest in Vietnam effectively.
The Vietnam policy is to attract foreign investers.
So you have many opportunities to enrich in Vietnam.
You don't have to worry about the law in
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Creating a universal online language should include cross references like music
and photography.
Is it possible to provide links within wiki pages written in moribund languages
to established blog topics within whichever given country the user wishes to
view?
[[Barack Obama]]
[[Induced pluripotent stem cell]]
Next years will be [[Large hadron collider]]
:)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Crazy Lover always_yours.fore...@yahoo.com
wrote:
What subject, can be consider the year's subject?
C.m.l
[[me]]
2008/12/30 Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu
[[Barack Obama]]
[[Induced pluripotent stem cell]]
Next years will be [[Large hadron collider]]
:)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Crazy Lover
always_yours.fore...@yahoo.com
wrote:
What subject, can be consider the year's subject
On 12/30/08, Crazy Lover always_yours.fore...@yahoo.com wrote:
What subject, can be consider the year's subject?
[[Wikisource]] :-)
--
John Vandenberg
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https
39 matches
Mail list logo
