Perhaps if Iran makes this official publicly, or they actually do it, the
Foundation, or maybe some volunteers, can respond via the blog? At least that
gets it into the discourse - but doesn't commit the Foundation itself to
anything.
I'm optimistic it will be resolved first through political
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Mono mium monom...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the kind of political action editors wished to promote in
situations like Italy or the USA wouldn't have the same effect in more
restrictive countries like China or Iran.
This is not accurate. People are
Unfortunately, the kind of political action editors wished to promote in
situations like Italy or the USA wouldn't have the same effect in more
restrictive countries like China or Iran.
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.comwrote:
Given the conversations about
David Gerard wrote:
2009/6/21 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Sure, transparency is a problem, but its absence alone does not imply
fraud. It hurts the Iranian authorities even more if the vote count is
accurate because nobody believes them.
Evidence the numbers were made up: humans are
Robert Rohde wrote:
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
While there may very well have been widespread fraud, that alone
wouldn't be enough to explain away a 29 percentage point spread. A
strong line of national security scare-mongering is always
2009/6/21 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Sure, transparency is a problem, but its absence alone does not imply
fraud. It hurts the Iranian authorities even more if the vote count is
accurate because nobody believes them.
Evidence the numbers were made up: humans are not very good at
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:00 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Evidence the numbers were made up: humans are not very good at picking
random numbers:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/20/AR200906204.html
(This is way off-topic ...)
Convincing,
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 3:00 PM, philippephilippe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wondering whether anyone's had a check in from any of our
wikimedians in Iran? Any safety reports on our folks?
Good question. I just know that Mardetanha (a steward) is physically
good and frustrated with election
Thanks, Milos... i was concerned about Mardetanha because of my
connection to him on Elec Comm, good to know he's well. Now let's see
what we can find out about the rest of our folks!
Thanks.
On Jun 20, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Milos Rancic wrote:
Good question. I just know that Mardetanha (a
I've got the first report. There are no information that something
happened to any Wikimedian.
Take a look at [1]. I don't expect bigger scale problems in Iran, but
not just because of that analysis. Except theocratic structures,
preset situation in Iran reminds me a lot to the situation in
Milos Rancic wrote:
I've got the first report. There are no information that something
happened to any Wikimedian.
Take a look at [1]. I don't expect bigger scale problems in Iran, but
not just because of that analysis. Except theocratic structures,
preset situation in Iran reminds me a lot
2009/6/20 Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net:
Milos Rancic wrote:
I've got the first report. There are no information that something
happened to any Wikimedian.
Take a look at [1]. I don't expect bigger scale problems in Iran, but
not just because of that analysis. Except theocratic
12 matches
Mail list logo
