On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net wrote:
My thought was for the Foundation to approach Amazon regarding carrying
listings of such books which seriously represent their content. as this
one does. Such a book approaches fraud.
Agreed. There is no *obligation*
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.net
wrote:
My thought was for the Foundation to approach Amazon regarding carrying
listings of such books which seriously represent their content. as this
one does. Such a book approaches fraud.
Agreed. There is no
In a message dated 11/1/2010 11:50:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
cimonav...@gmail.com writes:
Another thing that might shut this stuff down, or atleast make people
more
savvy in judging what quality they are getting, would be if we finally got
some
dead tree stuff out there with the WMF
Let's have our readers vote.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:49 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 11/1/2010 6:16:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
jay...@gmail.com writes:
The PLOS Medicine article is based on a dataset of 78 interventional
studies, 81 observational studies, and only
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Ashar Voultoiz hashar+...@free.fr wrote:
On 01/11/10 08:47, Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
Are there statistics about users' preferences on Wikimedia sites?
For example, a statistic that would say things like how many users use every
skin and how many users have Show
On 2 November 2010 12:02, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 11/1/2010 11:50:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
cimonav...@gmail.com writes:
Another thing that might shut this stuff down, or atleast make people
more
savvy in judging what quality they are getting, would be if we finally
The point is that you search for a book on Amazon, and find a book for 50
dollars that is just a conglomeration of articles that were put together by
a computer, not a human, and therefore have little value. It is just a big
rip off.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com
On 02/11/2010 04:59, geni wrote:
On 2 November 2010 03:53, Nikola Smolenskismole...@eunet.rs wrote:
Дана Tuesday 02 November 2010 02:57:10 geni написа:
2010/11/1 KIZU Naokoaph...@gmail.com:
I see, thanks Mike. Personally I'm not for this kind of attempt, I'd
rather agree with Ryan: if and
On 2 November 2010 19:56, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
Perhaps, but one can't claim moral rights:
o where the work is a computer program
o where ownership of a work originally vested in an author's employer
o where the material is being used in newspapers or magazines
o
I see it that way too. It is sufficient that if such questions arise
and are published, then we report on them.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:11 AM, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
mill...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 08:54, wiki-l...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
Quite right, the
On 1 November 2010 20:28, Wikipedia Signpost
wikipediasignp...@gmail.com wrote:
Single page view
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signpost/Single
Hey, is the Signpost also sent to the Announce mailing list? If not,
could it be?
It's always full of useful information, and I could
11 matches
Mail list logo
