On 15 July 2011 02:11, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
Three cheers for open standards and and backwards compatibility!
I would like to know if it is technically possible to edit a WP article
through that system.
I found it almost unusable on a 56k modem. So have fun!
- d.
On 07/15/2011 03:11 AM, Liam Wyatt wrote:
Saw this today:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9dpXHnJXaE
It's a video of a guy demonstrating his 1964 Livermore Data Systems Model
A Acoustic Coupler Modem that still works
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_coupler
and in order to demonstrate
Congratulations Liam, you've just made the case for micro stubs.
WSC
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:11:35 +
From: Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com
Subject: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia as seen through 1964 acoustic, 300
baud modem
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
On 15 July 2011 01:03, Alec Conroy alecmcon...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. They're a very very special tool, but software not a
reasonable definition for a movement. The Unnamed Movement should be
software-neutral, if not in name then CERTAINLY in practice.
It's a thing and it exists and
On 15 July 2011 08:31, WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations Liam, you've just made the case for micro stubs.
http://twitter.com/#!/qikipedia
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On 14 July 2011 23:33, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
I can envision something like an Open Knowledge Project or some other
umbrella initiative, aimed at forging links between like-minded
organizations who wish to associate without losing independence or
explicitly taking responsibility for
Phoebe created https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries ,
I suggest everyone interested in OA just join us there. I know is
yet-another-list,
but it will allow librarians from the outside to step in and join the
conversation.
There are few threads in which we are basically
I think this is a good idea (and better than trying to get all Free
Content/Open Knowledge/etc. people to badge themselves as somehow part
of our Wikimedia Movement, which though (hopefully!) welcoming and
inclusive is not as wide as the whole topic.
I'd note that there is of course the
I agree something like Open Knowledge Project would be a more suitable
term. Do they have any decals like those of Health on the Net that people
could add to their websites? Should there be different degree of
inclusiveness depending on non commercial or commercial reuse? I see this as
the first
- Original Message
From: James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Fri, July 15, 2011 10:39:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] roadmap for WM affiliation ; a name for
self-identified affiliation
I agree something like Open Knowledge Project would
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Birgitte SB birgitte...@yahoo.com wrote:
- Original Message
From: James Heilman jmh...@gmail.com
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Fri, July 15, 2011 10:39:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] roadmap for WM affiliation ; a name for
On 15 July 2011 20:07, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, I think debating the name is a bit cart before horse -
the idea is that these organizations seem to share common ideals, and
could cooperative in mutually beneficial ways with some sort of formal
vehicle.
I don't entirely agree.
- Original Message
From: Nathan nawr...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Fri, July 15, 2011 2:07:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] roadmap for WM affiliation ; a name for
self-identified affiliation
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at
13 matches
Mail list logo
