to decrease significantly on weekends)
[1] http://dammit.lt/wikistats/ Caution: fairly large page
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mr.Z-man/views
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
-compliant and we have no idea that they exist or they want
to be compliant, read the terms of the GFDL, and decide not to bother
with our content.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
to be suppressing
criticism? Forcibly change policies? Act as proxies for people afraid of
criticism? I'm struggling to think of anything that could be done on a
foundation level that would be effective here.
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l
Marc Riddell wrote:
on 1/8/09 11:02 PM, Alex at mrzmanw...@gmail.com wrote:
And how is the foundation supposed to resolve this? Counsel people into
changing their opinions? Ban people who appear to be suppressing
criticism? Forcibly change policies? Act as proxies for people afraid
and one reference to the section.
There might be a way to use one of the clauses to do this but it would
be darn hard and the foundation has made statements that it won't use
the relevant clause.
Its actually the GFDL that has the 5 principle authors thing, section 4.
--
Alex
their usefulness to the projects.
The biggest departure from that principle is that most of the day-to-day
running isn't done on the mailing lists, mostly everything at the
project-level is done on-wiki on discussion pages.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
principle that I am aware of?
A simple procedure? Yes, disabling the extension would be rather simple,
repairing the thousands of templates that would be broken in the
process, not so much.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
everything easier.
OTOH I encourage you to review selinux. That would make a great heading
'Nikola Smolenski discovers NSA backdoor on Linux code'
This is getting rather off-topic, especially for this thread, and
possibly for the list as well.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
:
It was a clear factual error which I corrected. If you aren't going to
criticize the original comment you have no basis for criticizing the
correction.
At any rate, what exactly is the topic of this thread, in your opinion?
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Alex mrzmanw...@gmail.com wrote
issues (or things like sourcing and NPOV, as long as its notable), and
many people concerned about BLPs don't involve themselves in the
deletion process.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
be publicly viewable
immediately. Unless the user was purposely intending to do something
that he knew would be disallowed by the abuse filter, he was fully
intending for whatever he wrote to be made public.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation
of thousands of articles all at once is rather
unrealistic. Several months ago, I told Erik on this list that enwiki
would never be able to get consensus for FR, it looks like I'm wrong
about that. Perhaps there's some hope left after all.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
not be for the board members, but I imagine for the volunteer
developers and other community members who had few or no real
commitments it was.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
Michael Bimmler wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Alex mrzmanw...@gmail.com wrote:
Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Domas Mituzas midom.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually, I'd be happy if you were right (and you probably are!) - it
shows, that lots of people had
. At this
point, even the best compromise proposal would likely mean major changes
for some projects. And on the largest projects, even a small change to
the primary inclusion guideline would likely have a big impact.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
copies. With the proposals here, we'd be taking
something that's already available to everyone electronically and
etching it onto metal plates, engraving in stone, etc. and presumably
locking it in a bomb shelter somewhere, so the benefits/costs aren't the
same.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
themselves if they didn't have to
download tons of data they don't need.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
URLs
or a particular code block in them. It'll stop the well-meaning but
misguided admins. Short of restricting site JS to the point of
uselessness, you'll never be able to stop determined abusers.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l
the most obvious cases like Google analytics.
Otherwise, take a look at Simetricals earlier post.
John
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org
John at Darkstar wrote:
Alex skrev:
John at Darkstar wrote:
Hmm? There's no reason to do anything like that. The AbuseFilter would
just prevent sitewide JS pages from being saved with the particular URLs
or a particular code block in them. It'll stop the well-meaning but
misguided admins
(edits and other
logged actions), not individual pageviews.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
report from 2 miles away versus 5
miles away? After a point, it just becomes redundant. And of course we'd
still have to rely on the weather services for things like radar and
satellite images.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l
if you want it, its in a MySQL table on
the toolserver right now.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
.
They typically leave more detailed summaries:
Reverted N edits by X identified as vandalism to last revision by Y
Reverted edits by X (talk) to last version by Y
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l
I wonder which would be harder, trying to start the first new project in
years, or trying to get the English Wikipedia to make a significant
policy change?
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
On 2/27/2010 12:40 PM, David Goodman wrote:
WP contains many of the essential elements
yet. IMO, setting a deadline, missing it, and explaining
why it was missed is better than not setting a deadline until you know
you can meet it (which kind of defeats the purpose of setting it).
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l
that enwiki would get it eventually, why did the
foundation wait until 6 months /after/ enwiki requested it to hire
people to work on this?
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
On 3/1/2010 7:58 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
One of the things developers are not necessarily good at is communication
have a troubleshooter for a printer not working:
1. Is the printer plugged in and on?
Yes
2. Is there paper loaded?
Yes
3. Sorry, that's all this troubleshooter can help you with for now.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing
if it doesn't completely backfire on us and the
non-conservative media doesn't make it look like we're burning books or
that they misconstrue it and assume we've adopted some sort of outright
no-nudity policy.
[1] http://bit.ly/d8y5vy
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
.
Except unless we consider the initial edit to be the first check, its
not correct. Only one person independent from the editor is reviewing
each edit.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
, this raises the question, if we're assuming that most
editors are checking their work and are trying to improve the
encyclopedia, why do we need to double check their work? We wouldn't
call the system Second guess, but that's kind of what this explanation
sounds like.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man
outside of
mainspace.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mr.Z-man/newusers
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
dangerous than plain HTML, at least not significantly so to the extent
that we should avoid linking to a page on the sole basis that it uses
PHP. Its files that are executed client-side, outside of the browser
like exe and zip files that we need to be concerned about.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z
The best option according to us (Malayalam Wikipedians -
http://ml.wikipedia.org) is to use the second option for the article titles
. That is, transliterate the keyword to your language.
There is no copyright issue attached with that, I suppose. We do that
throughout our daily life. For example,
Recently I had a discussion with one of my fellow Malayalam wikipedian (
http://ml.wikipedia.org) about the creation of new articles in small
wikipedias like ours. He is one the few users who is keen on creating new
articles *based on the requirement of our readers*. (Of course we have many
people
. This would be a SUPER useful tool for all Wikis.
-m.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Shiju Alex shijualexonl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Recently I had a discussion with one of my fellow Malayalam wikipedian (
http://ml.wikipedia.org) about the creation of new articles in small
wikipedias like ours. He
Yes. This is true. Many messages are marked as spam during the past few
days.
I got this message also from the SPAM folder.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Daniel ~ Leinad danny.lei...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/6/17 Ryan Lomonaco wiki.ral...@gmail.com:
A housekeeping note: Gmail has been
follow.
Regards
Shiju Alex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shijualex
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
really? It's a) not
particularly well-written, mostly and b) referenced overwhelmingly to
English-language sources, most of which are, you guessed it.. Western in
nature.
Very much true. Now English Wikipedians want some one to translate and use
the exact copy of en:wp in all other
between the wiki community and the Google translators (speakers
of the same language) :(
Shiju
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
Shiju Alex,
Stevertigo is just one en.wikipedian.
As far as using exact copies goes, I don't know about the policy
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
4) Include a list of most needed articles for people to create, rather
than random articles that will be of little use to local readers. Some
articles, such as those on local topics, have the added benefit of
://www.ragibhasan.com
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Shiju Alex shijualexonl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello All,
Recently there are lot of discussions (in this list also) regarding the
translation project by Google for some of the big language wikipedias.
The
foundation also seems like
Dear All,
The following mail is about a PDF rendering solution for non-Latin scripts
which is under development. One of the main reason for developing this tool
is that the current *Download to PDF* option (available in the sidebar of
wiki) is useless for Indic language scripts (current Download
for
GLAM type events.
But I also do not know the solution for this issue. Requesting constructive
discussion.
Shiju Alex
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sreejith K. sreejithk2...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:03 PM
Subject: Copyright problems of images from India
To: Shiju
http://www.roulette-casino-en-ligne.com/home.php
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
45 matches
Mail list logo
