Thank you! Now reading it. :-)
In the meanwhile:
Jay Walsh, 17/12/2011 00:34:
This year we considerably expanded our multi-lingual effort by adding 6
translated 'summary' reports in Arabic, Japanese, French, German,
Portugese, and Spanish.
How were those languages chosen? I can't see any
How were those languages chosen? I can't see any (clear) criterion being
used. I've already asked the same question for the Wikimedia
highlights (and something else) and I didn't get any answer; given that
you're using the same languages for eveything, it would be nice to
explain where
May be just because they did not have anybody to translate to other
languages, as the composition of Transcom suggests?
Cheers
Yaroslav
To correct myself, it just means that nobody did the translations
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Highlights,_September_2011
The
Yaroslav M. Blanter, 17/12/2011 09:29:
May be just because they did not have anybody to translate to other
languages, as the composition of Transcom suggests?
Cheers
Yaroslav
To correct myself, it just means that nobody did the translations
No. In the highlights case, it was about the
The Wikimedia Foundation is happy to announce the release of the 2010-11
Annual Report, which is now posted on the WMF Wiki at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Annual_Report
From here you can download a high and lo res PDF of the report, or go right
to the meta-hosted wiki version. And for
