On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:59 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Steven Walling wrote:
The other Wikipedias weren't started on that date, so they have nothing to
celebrate or commemorate.
The anniversary is not just about English Wikipedia. If this was just
English Wikipedia's
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:59 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 January 2011 00:56, Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
It may be a bit late to ship t-shirts to Antarctica and, they are likely to
be not warm enough.
We're talking about the finest mad scientists of
I support Lodewijk and Delphine. Wikipedia 10 logo is fine, but it's
less impulsive.
2011/1/6 Delphine Ménard notafi...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:59 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Steven Walling wrote:
The other Wikipedias weren't started on that date, so they have nothing
2011/1/5 Виктория mstisla...@gmail.com:
You can compare Flagged Revvs to Soviet Union, after all, Jaron Lanier is
etc.
I guess that the original poster has a point: we use external services
which may or may not be trivial to change or update.
It is not important which country, group or whatever
On Wed, January 5, 2011 10:02 pm, George Herbert wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt
wrote:
Is this supposed to be funny?
Time to address this matter to the list moderators.
Sincerely,
Virgilio A. P. Machado
Neither of these was funny; both were
Me too. Using the old logo is emphazising the cohesion of Wikipedia as
one project. On other occasions there can be other logos.
Kind regards
Ziko
2011/1/6 KIZU Naoko aph...@gmail.com:
I support Lodewijk and Delphine. Wikipedia 10 logo is fine, but it's
less impulsive.
2011/1/6 Delphine
On 6 January 2011 00:59, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Steven Walling wrote:
The other Wikipedias weren't started on that date, so they have nothing to
celebrate or commemorate.
The anniversary is not just about English Wikipedia. If this was just
English Wikipedia's celebration, there
