On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 20:04 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:43 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 18:44, Murray Cumming wrote:
But yes, I'll try the endorsement strategy if I have to.
I prefer Adrian Custer's suggestion.
Tell me where to sign! :)
Let's
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 20:04 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:43 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Today at 18:44, Murray Cumming wrote:
But yes, I'll try the endorsement strategy if I have to.
I
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no
official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be
interpreted like a legal document.
s/condition/assumption/ ?
No. It's a condition that I
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no
official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be
interpreted like a legal
This seems wildly tangential. There's a loss of perspective. The code of
conduct is rather unlikely to become the tool of a fascist regime. If
you think that is a significant risk then just don't sign the thing.
It already has clear language saying that it's not a legal document and
there's no
Dear Foundation Members;
New set of ballots for those renewed after voting start sent yesterday.
84 people renewed their membership last week and all of them (including
members who has changed their e-mail addresses last week) should have
recevied their ballots and can vote before 16st of
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 20:45 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
This seems wildly tangential. There's a loss of perspective. The code of
conduct is rather unlikely to become the tool of a fascist regime. If
you think that is a significant risk then just don't sign the thing.
I agree and I too think
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no
official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be
On 12/4/06, Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has 82 signatures. Last year 169 members could be bothered to vote
for the board. It sounds like we've pretty much got community adoption
now, or will in a couple of days ;-)
Additionally, the mailing list consensus is that no top-down
Hi,
the membership page at http://foundation.gnome.org/membership/
unfortunately does not indicate the procedure to follow to cease being a
foundation member. Could anybody indicate to me please how to do that?
Thanks
Andreas
--
Andreas J. Guelzow
I endorse the candidacy of Dave Neary and Anne Oestergaard, because of
their strong support for free software and its freedoms.
Most practical improvements to GNOME will advance the Free Software
Movement--but there are exceptions. There are also specific things
the GNOME Foundation can do to
11 matches
Mail list logo
