Hi,
It is also important to give equally good support to other systems
people can use for telling each other about events; for instance,
social networking sites of the free software community, and
peer-to-peer methods. This way, GNOME won't favor Facebook over those
other methods.
I'm
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi,
Hi Vincent,
The GNOME presence at FOSDEM this year was quite good, and I believe
things went (surprisingly ;-)) smoothly:
Thanks for the nice summary. :)
+ the beer event on Saturday evening was a good
Le mardi 23 février 2010, à 14:01 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
As discussed during the last IRC meeting of the Foundation, we're going
to hold another IRC meeting next Saturday:
When: Saturday, February 27th, from 16:00 to 17:00 UTC
Where: irc.gnome.org, #foundation
Le samedi 27 février 2010, à 16:29 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
+ the beer event on Saturday evening was a good place to catch up with
GNOME friends.
While that event is always awesome due to many GNOME
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 09:26 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
but none has actually stepped up to write actual code (as Martyn says,
everytime you start writting something, you hit the legacy wall).
It sounds like this might be a case of conflicting goals that cannot
all be satisfied.
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
If people are going to use Facebook, they should access it with free software.
And it is useful for GNOME to do a good job of that.
Richard,
I wish you and the FSF would focus more on user rights and licensing of
(meta)data coming from
I'm going to call for an end of thread,
If people want to sort out what their personal points of view on what
GNOME should be, I would suggest them to follow up that discussion in
private and not in this list anymore.
If people want to contribute to a strategic roadmap for GNOME, I think
we all
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 00:30 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I'm going to call for an end of thread,
I think you're wrong, this thread should not be closed yet.
If people want to sort out what their personal points of view on what
GNOME should be, I would suggest them to follow up that discussion
El dom, 28-02-2010 a las 00:30 +, Alberto Ruiz escribió:
I'm going to call for an end of thread,
If people want to sort out what their personal points of view on what
GNOME should be, I would suggest them to follow up that discussion in
private and not in this list anymore.
+1.
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 19:48 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Hey Diego,
El dom, 28-02-2010 a las 00:49 +0100, Philip Van Hoof escribió:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
[cut]
I wish you and the FSF would focus more on user rights and licensing of
(meta)data
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME programmers
know. We do.
I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when Mr. Van
Hoof represent me without my concent. I really want to know who in the the hell
made him the GNOME developers'
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:02 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME
programmers know. We do.
I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when
Mr. Van Hoof represent me without my concent. I really want to
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 02:01:21PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
As discussed during the last IRC meeting of the Foundation, we're going
to hold another IRC meeting next Saturday:
Please send this to foundation-announce instead. It is meant for
announcements. I am going to unsubscribe from
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 03:11 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 04:02 +0200, Zeeshan Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME
programmers know. We do.
I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when
14 matches
Mail list logo
