OK folks, let's keep moving otherwise we'll just rathole into a topic that
we don't need to get into. Richard has made his point. Let's move on.
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Luc Pionchon wrote:
> On 27 April 2013 19:15, Lefty wrote:
>
>> On Apr 27, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Luc Pionchon wrote:
>
On 27 April 2013 19:15, Lefty wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Luc Pionchon wrote:
>
> On 27 April 2013 17:08, Stormy Peters wrote:
>
> Continuously telling some of our biggest fans that they are wrong all
>> the time is not the way to grow our project.
>>
>
> As a soft note, I did not rea
On 27 April 2013 17:08, Stormy Peters wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> They are open source based startups. They call themselves open source
> projects. I think we should refer to them as open source projects
> regardless of what we call GNOME.
>
> If people from open source software projects want to joi
Hi Richard,
They are open source based startups. They call themselves open source
projects. I think we should refer to them as open source projects
regardless of what we call GNOME.
If people from open source software projects want to join us at a GNOME
event to learn more about GNOME, we should
This is true. Portland has a very large presence of many open source based
start ups
We're happy to accept support from those that talk about "open
source", but let's take care to present GNOME as a free/libre software
project, with the goal of giving users freedom, rather than using the
