Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 20:33 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > Ironically, I was serving as his conduit into the list(s). > I will certainly stop. > > Which of these lists is he banned from?  Both? I don't know, but maybe he's just not subscribed. If so, his posts won't appear until approved by a

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Richard Stallman
> My guess is that Lefty is replying publicly, that his posts are not > being allowed through the list for some reason, and that Richard > understandably does not realize nobody else can see the posts he is > replying to. Ironically, I was serving as his conduit into the list(s). I will

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Jens Georg
> I do not understand.  What I am doing is sending the reply to a > message to the same lists that the other message went to.  I do that > because these messages attack me and I deserve a chance to respond. I assumed that you were accidently moving a conversation from the private ML to the

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Nuritzi Sanchez
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > > Can you please stop leaking half a conversation from a private mailing > > list to a public one? Thank you. > > I do not understand. What I am doing is sending the reply to a > message to the same lists that the

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Richard Stallman
> Can you please stop leaking half a conversation from a private mailing > list to a public one? Thank you. I do not understand. What I am doing is sending the reply to a message to the same lists that the other message went to. I do that because these messages attack me and I deserve a

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 07:04 +0200, Jens Georg wrote: > Can you please stop leaking half a conversation from a private > mailing  > list to a public one? Thank you. In Richard's defense, I don't believe the emails he's replying to are intended to be private. In the mailing list archives, there are

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Jens Georg wrote: >> >> I do agree that seeing only part of the conversation isn't >> particularly helpful, > > > Sorry for not making this clear, that was the point I was trying to make > here. Nothing else. Indeed, now an apology from me, if it

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread Jens Georg
I do agree that seeing only part of the conversation isn't particularly helpful, Sorry for not making this clear, that was the point I was trying to make here. Nothing else. ___ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org

Re: Code of Conduct Adoption Process

2016-09-16 Thread James
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Jens Georg wrote: > Can you please stop leaking half a conversation from a private mailing list > to a public one? Thank you. I have to interject here. What it sounds like is that one foundation list member (doesn't matter who it is) is getting