On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 10:11 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I just want to put this in perspective: the foundation has $200,000 in
the bank, with guaranteed income of $100,000 a year approx. One employee
costs at least $70,000 per year, and depending on the role up to
$100,000 or
On Nov 30, 2007 2:30 PM, Philip Van Hoof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the foundation could setup (orchestrate) meetings (or interops
or however you want to call them) with the different teams. Gather the
right people and put them together from time to times.
I agree 100% with this, and it
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 12:15 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 10:18 +, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 12/1/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing that quality control could eat some (human) resources. Also as
John says this could easily lead to an
GNOME is based on a philosophy, but it is not just a philosophy.
It is a project to develop and maintain a desktop environment.
A technical project has to make specific technical decisions. It
can't favor all the options that fit the philosophy; often it has to
choose an avenue and follow it.
Hi,
Sorry, I'll reply briefly because my free time is limited today. I hope
it will be understandable :-)
Le vendredi 30 novembre 2007, à 02:51 +0100, Philip Van Hoof a écrit :
Hi there,
The questions:
o. Given that the Foundation of GNOME has plenty of money, will you if
elected vote
Hi,
Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
I still don't think Foundation should get involved into saying place X
is an approbed training center, I fear that would go beyond its scope.
But the foundation could publish a syllabus and some sample exams, and
then licence training institutes and companies
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:42 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
Hi,
As warned about earlier in this election (by someone with better
foresight than I have), when there isn't an organized call for
questions people will fire off zillions of them at random. This puts
an unreasonable burden on not
On 12/1/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
I still don't think Foundation should get involved into saying place X
is an approbed training center, I fear that would go beyond its scope.
But the foundation could publish a syllabus and some sample
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 10:18 +, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 12/1/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing that quality control could eat some (human) resources. Also as
John says this could easily lead to an unintentioned favouritism.
Unintentioned favouritism is a cheap reason
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 10:11:15 +0100
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I just want to put this in perspective: the foundation has $200,000 in
the bank, with guaranteed income of $100,000 a year approx. One employee
costs at least $70,000 per year, and depending on the role
On 12/1/07, Philip Van Hoof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 10:18 +, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
On 12/1/07, Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing that quality control could eat some (human) resources. Also as
John says this could easily lead to an unintentioned
Hey
On 11/30/07, Bastian, Waldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o. What is your opinion on an examination that could carry the
title:
GNOME Mobile certified software developer exam
If the examination is offered by a third party, then I would say they
are violating the trademark
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 20:28 +, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
Hey
On 11/30/07, Bastian, Waldo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
o. What is your opinion on an examination that could carry the
title:
GNOME Mobile certified software developer exam
If the examination is offered
quote who=Elijah Newren
What will you as a candidate do to make sure we avoid this mess in the
future?
Work with the Membership Committee to document their practices and make sure
they perform them more consistently in future years.
During the current term, I have already made that you won't
Hey
On 11/30/07, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(...)
What will you as a candidate do to make sure we avoid this mess in the future?
I can only think of asking for question much sooner or proposing some
topics under which to fill questions. But honestly, I don't know if
anything
Hi,
As warned about earlier in this election (by someone with better
foresight than I have), when there isn't an organized call for
questions people will fire off zillions of them at random. This puts
an unreasonable burden on not only the candidates who feel obligated
to spend time responding
quote who=Jeff Waugh
Work with the Membership Committee to document their practices and make
sure they perform them more consistently in future years.
Miss one word and it changes the entire tone... and help make sure. They
have done a great job this year, though as a result of numerous
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 20:30 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
I think the foundation could setup (orchestrate) meetings (or interops
or however you want to call them) with the different teams. Gather the
right people and put them together from time to times.
The foundation tries to do that, and
Hi,
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
o. Given that the Foundation of GNOME has plenty of money, will you if
elected vote to spend this money on important projects?
I just want to put this in perspective: the foundation has $200,000 in
the bank, with guaranteed income of $100,000 a year approx. One
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 00:43 -0800, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
o. What is your opinion on an examination that could carry the
title:
GNOME Mobile certified software developer exam
If the examination is offered by a third party, then I would say they
are violating the trademark
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 02:51 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Hi there,
The questions:
o. Given that the Foundation of GNOME has plenty of money, will you if
elected vote to spend this money on important projects?
Being mostly interested in mobile targets and GNOME Mobile, I could
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 00:43 -0800, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
o. What is your opinion on an examination that could carry the
title:
GNOME Mobile certified software developer exam
If the examination is offered by a third party, then I would say they
are violating the trademark
Hi there,
The questions:
o. Given that the Foundation of GNOME has plenty of money, will you if
elected vote to spend this money on important projects?
Being mostly interested in mobile targets and GNOME Mobile, I could
certainly come up with some projects that might both increase
23 matches
Mail list logo
