Hi,
Martyn Russell wrote:
On 22/02/10 19:27, Dave Neary wrote:
Have we lost the mobile battle? It certainly appears that GTK+ has lost
the mobile battle,
I don't think that's so true. Just because Nokia decided to buy
Trolltech because it could be bought, doesn't mean the rest of the world
Hi,
Richard Stallman wrote:
What's important
to GNOME is the vision and the philosophy of open access,
The philosophy of GNOME is that the user should have freedom.
If we talk in terms of open or access then we omit what is
most important.
Software freedom is a means to furthering
2010/2/23 Dave Neary dne...@gnome.org:
Hi,
Martyn Russell wrote:
On 22/02/10 19:27, Dave Neary wrote:
Have we lost the mobile battle? It certainly appears that GTK+ has lost
the mobile battle,
I don't think that's so true. Just because Nokia decided to buy
Trolltech because it could be
Hi,
As discussed during the last IRC meeting of the Foundation, we're going
to hold another IRC meeting next Saturday:
When: Saturday, February 27th, from 16:00 to 17:00 UTC
Where: irc.gnome.org, #foundation
We understand that this time might not suit everybody, but we tried to
On 23/02/10 12:36, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2010/2/23 Dave Nearydne...@gnome.org:
I'd like to point out something though.
As promising as the situation was, I don't think they seriously
invested in the toolkit itself AFACT, during all this years RedHat
(through mclasen and alexl) and individual
Hi,
The GNOME presence at FOSDEM this year was quite good, and I believe
things went (surprisingly ;-)) smoothly:
+ we had a good booth, thanks to the event box, t-shirts, stickers,
and most importantly thanks to the amazing volunteers.
+ the devroom went quite well, with a good attendance
Le mardi 23 février 2010, à 15:23 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
As a reminder: the original money for all this came from the Foundation
(in 2008, if I'm not mistaken), and since this bootstrap step, we're
able to sponsor the GNOME presence at FOSDEM with the money we get from
t-shirts. The
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Andrew Savory
andrew.sav...@limofoundation.org wrote:
Perhaps we should reach out to the mobile and embedded community and
ask them to contribute e.g. how to get GTK running on a smartphone?
Getting a few of those guys over to GUADEC might stimulate some
Hi!
Actually, I think that the Red Hat maintainers of the toolkit had an
interest in stability (for ISVs) and that stifled development. As such
developing anything in GTK+ takes a lot longer than it should and that's
why it is always hard to get into development there or to fix something.
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 13:20 +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:37:46PM +, Martyn Russell wrote:
seems gtk+'s object model overhead (for example, object method
invocation) is too high, especially visible on mobile platforms...
it should be possible to optimize
El mar, 23-02-2010 a las 17:02 +0100, Philip Van Hoof escribió:
On 23/02/10 12:36, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I often hear complaints about how the RedHat guys turn down
patches
from other contributors (mostly from members of companies
competing
with them),
Well if that's the case, then
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 18:38 +0200, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
El mar, 23-02-2010 a las 17:02 +0100, Philip Van Hoof escribió:
Hey Claudio,
On 23/02/10 12:36, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
I often hear complaints about how the RedHat guys turn down patches
from other contributors (mostly from
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 16:53 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi Martyn,
Don't be confused: most of this reply isn't directed at you personally.
On 23/02/10 16:09, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Le mar. 23 févr. 2010 à 14:12:47 (+), Martyn Russell a écrit:
Actually, I think that the Red Hat
13 matches
Mail list logo
