On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 21:32 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> At a technical level, I wish that GNOME made it easier to relate
> the visible GUI level to the underlying level of the command line
As an aside, one thing I find myself doing a lot of is:
$ cd ~/some/path
$ command
$ another
Hm. This w
El mié, 03-03-2010 a las 02:36 +0100, Philip Van Hoof escribió:
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 18:19 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:
> > People are not interested in having this argument and you are causing
> > people to unsubscribe to the Foundation List and to quit
> > participating.
>
> That's their actio
On 3/2/10 4:39 PM, "Stormy Peters" wrote:
>
> Philip, I think a lot of people are saying they'd rather not see these
> arguments on the Foundation list.
That's not what I'm seeing. What I'm seeing are personal attacks and loose
rhetoric (e.g. "pissing contest") in response to pretty reasoned att
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 18:19 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:
> Because you are being disruptive on the Foundation List.
Again. That's your believe. Good for you.
> People are not interested in having this argument and you are causing
> people to unsubscribe to the Foundation List and to quit
> parti
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I wonder why *nobody* so far is going into the things that I said in my
> last reply, but why everybody so far is instead going into this.
>
Because you are being disruptive on the Foundation List. People are not
interested in having this
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:39 -0700, Stormy Peters wrote:
> 2010/3/2 Philip Van Hoof
>
> > Stop dragging the GNOME Foundation list down these off topic
> > roads and stop this pissing contest.
> I think you, and many other people, are misinterpreting this
>
2010/3/2 Philip Van Hoof
>
> Stop dragging the GNOME Foundation list down these off topic roads and
> stop this pissing contest.
>
>
>
> I think you, and many other people, are misinterpreting this as a pissing
> contest. It's not. It's a quite serious debate.
>
> And I think it's insulting of y
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 18:58 -0500, john palmieri wrote:
Hey John,
I'm keeping most of the original E-mails. I have been misquoted and my
quotes have been taken out of context too often for [CUT] to be useful.
It's sad, but truth.
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Philip Van Hoof
> wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 22:59 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > IMHO talking about Facebook and who should demand them to free info is a
> > bit out of place here. Please let's not diverge the thread into that
> or
> > into a battle
On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 22:59 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> IMHO talking about Facebook and who should demand them to free info is a
> bit out of place here. Please let's not diverge the thread into that or
> into a battle about how much we should promote Free Software or non Free
> al
Hi;
> > There's an IRC log and maybe even minutes, but, hrm, it's not
> > readable for me:
> > http://live.gnome.org/FoundationBoard/Minutes/IRC20100227
> >
>
> Yeah I kind of broke the ACL :-). Only Javier Jardón can *read* and
> write it. Any admin around? #lalala
I fixed the ACLs.
11 matches
Mail list logo
