Fwd: Candidacy: Seif Lotfy

2010-06-03 Thread Iain
Lefty fwd'd his reply to the list, but not mine to him. -- Forwarded message -- From: Iain i...@gnome.org Date: Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:34 PM Subject: Re: Candidacy: Seif Lotfy To: Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org

Re: Fwd: Candidacy: Seif Lotfy

2010-06-03 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 11:52 +0100, Iain wrote: On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Lefty (石鏡 ) le...@shugendo.org wrote: On 6/1/10 7:38 AM, Iain i...@gnome.org wrote: It seems to me that your underlying belief is that there is too much (large) corporate influence in GNOME. Would you say that

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010, à 01:13 -0400, Sergey Panov a écrit : On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 20:45 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Sergey Panov si...@sipan.org wrote: I sense a suspicion from the outsiders (not RedHat employees) that project is not just manned by the

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010, à 11:54 +0200, Seif Lotfy a écrit : On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting them. But would't you

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Le jeudi 03 juin 2010 à 12:12 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : snip Really, how is it different from what's happening in any other module? I can certainly blame Guillaume and Xavier for not being able to have metacontacts in empathy today while it's something I asked two years ago; but they've

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Andreas Nilsson
On 06/03/2010 02:54 AM, Seif Lotfy wrote: And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting them. But would't you like to have the points you disagree with be discussed or reevaluated? I

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
2010/6/3 Sriram Ramkrishna s...@ramkrishna.me: On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: the GNOME Shell design and development process, as somebody that looks at it (slightly) from the outside, and since its inception, has been nothing *but* open. it's your

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
2010/6/3 Andreas Nilsson nisses.m...@home.se On 06/03/2010 02:54 AM, Seif Lotfy wrote: And don't get me wrong -- I happen to disagree with some stuff they're doing from time to time. But it doesn't mean I should stop trusting them. But would't you like to have the points you disagree

Re: Some notes on GNOME Shell

2010-06-03 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:53 AM, William Jon McCann william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com wrote: This would be a good FAQ. We really do need a gnome-shell FAQ I think. I might help out on the whole community thing on shell if people are willing, it depends on whether this six month project I'm

Status update? (was Re: Starting the process for this year's Boston Summit)

2010-06-03 Thread Joanmarie Diggs
Hi John. A number of us from the a11y community will be attending the AEGIS Conference in Spain. We're now in the (very early) planning stages of an associated hackfest [1] and are trying to decide if it should extend through 9 October. At least for me, the answer depends on what the plans are