On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Sebastian Keller
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I have seen people on #gnome on freenode asking for the official
>> channels of gnome components, but those were very very few and almost
>> all of them were ask
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Sebastian Keller
wrote:
>
>
> I have seen people on #gnome on freenode asking for the official
> channels of gnome components, but those were very very few and almost
> all of them were asking for support and not how to contribute to
> development. (Assuming they t
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 13:36 +0200, Daniel Mustieles García wrote:
> I could help with this task opening bugs for errors and/or
> enhancements, or simply recommending some bugs to the students or
> testing patches.
Defining tasks is certainly nice, but would you also volunteer as a
mentor for stude
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 13:55 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Tristan Van Berkom :
>
> > Again, how do you expect to achieve this hypothetical migration ?
> >
> > You will post a memo and people will just happily follow the
> > foundation's decree ?
> >
> > I think you've misunderstood how th
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 16:19 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Freenode seems to be
> seriously understaffed (see for example [1]).
I agree and disagree. While Freenode "top-dog" staffing may be tight,
the features that Freenode offers allow you to self-administrate
channels thus relying very littl
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 07:34 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs wrote:
> These would be nice to have. But I wonder if the best way to address
> it
> is not to up and leave GimpNet, but instead to get those features
> added
> to GimpNet.
I have to agree here. While I did find it interesting to note, more as
a
On 12-10-15 06:24 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
>
>> > In the past I've joined the #opers channel multiple times asking why
>> > there was no intention to improve the GIMPNET network but I alwais
>> > received no answer and as of today I still don't know the real reason
>> > behind that decision.
> O
On 12-10-15 05:23 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> I said *many* people gave their consensus about a possible move but I
> didn't see a *single* mail saying we should stay on GIMPNET for the X,
> Y, Z reason.
Sure, many of us avoid replying "+1" to something that someone else has
already said very well.
On Mon, October 15, 2012 6:01 am, Simos Xenitellis wrote:
> The announcement indeed does not mention translations.
> Are we positive that the organizers specifically do not want to have
> translation tasks this year? Citation?
There's a page called Information for Mentors and Org Admins for GCI 2
2012/10/15 Tristan Van Berkom :
> No, that's the point you don't seem to get.
>
> We are an assembly of projects, the gnome foundation is an umbrella
> which is there to support us, defend our copyrights and branding
> if and where possible (if not I suppose we go to the FSF), particularly
> the b
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Tristan Van Berkom :
>
>> Again, how do you expect to achieve this hypothetical migration ?
>>
>> You will post a memo and people will just happily follow the
>> foundation's decree ?
>>
>> I think you've misunderstood how things wor
2012/10/15 Joanmarie Diggs :
>
>>> Who exactly "owns" GimpNet and if asking on #opers doesn't get us the
>>> answers we seek, how else can we get them?
>>
>> Very nice question Joanmarie, who takes decisions on behalf of the
>> GIMPNET network? if GIMPNET is aliased the GNOME IRC network why they
>
>> Who exactly "owns" GimpNet and if asking on #opers doesn't get us the
>> answers we seek, how else can we get them?
>
> Very nice question Joanmarie, who takes decisions on behalf of the
> GIMPNET network? if GIMPNET is aliased the GNOME IRC network why they
> don't listen to contributor's ide
2012/10/15 Tristan Van Berkom :
> Again, how do you expect to achieve this hypothetical migration ?
>
> You will post a memo and people will just happily follow the
> foundation's decree ?
>
> I think you've misunderstood how things work in the real world.
> Unless you actually pull the plug on Gi
Hi,
I'm one of the guys who has been doing irc support on both networks for
several years now and I think I can provide some observations here:
Am Montag, den 15.10.2012, 12:32 +0200 schrieb Andrea Veri:
> Freenode has more than 8 users and I'm pretty much sure a lot of
> new contributors wil
2012/10/15 Joanmarie Diggs :
> On 10/15/2012 06:53 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I explained the benefits in my original mail but here they are again:
>>
>> - services, that means having the ownership of your nick. No one will
>> be able to spoof your identity. (plus host cloaking with hand
On 10/15/2012 06:53 AM, Andrea Veri wrote:
[...]
> I explained the benefits in my original mail but here they are again:
>
> - services, that means having the ownership of your nick. No one will
> be able to spoof your identity. (plus host cloaking with handy (for
> example) /gnome/marketing/foo
Althought I'm not the maintainer, I'd like to propose fixing and improving
Gtranslator as a task for GCI.
As André says, mentoring may take more time than fixing the bugs, but the
project is in a critical stage, since the maintainer has announced that he
is not maintaining it anymore, and nobody i
Andrea Veri wrote:
> In the past I've joined the #opers channel multiple times asking why
> there was no intention to improve the GIMPNET network but I alwais
> received no answer and as of today I still don't know the real reason
> behind that decision.
On the opposite I've always had a fast and
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
>> hi;
>>
>> On 15 October 2012 11:32, Andrea Veri wrote:
>>> 2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
>>>
have we had any indication that being on irc.gnome.org is in any way,
shape, or form preventing people from c
2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
> hi;
>
> On 15 October 2012 11:32, Andrea Veri wrote:
>> 2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
>>
>>> have we had any indication that being on irc.gnome.org is in any way,
>>> shape, or form preventing people from contributing to GNOME - and that
>>> moving to freenode would o
2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
> hi;
>
> On 15 October 2012 11:23, Andrea Veri wrote:
>> 2012/10/15 Bastien Nocera :
>>> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 15:45 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
I see many people have expressed their consensus in this, thus I'll
defer the decision to the Board. Thanks to anyo
hi;
On 15 October 2012 11:32, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
>
>> have we had any indication that being on irc.gnome.org is in any way,
>> shape, or form preventing people from contributing to GNOME - and that
>> moving to freenode would open the floodgates to new contributors?
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Bastien Nocera :
>> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 15:45 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
>>> I see many people have expressed their consensus in this, thus I'll
>>> defer the decision to the Board. Thanks to anyone sending a mail about
>>> this con
hi;
On 15 October 2012 11:23, Andrea Veri wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Bastien Nocera :
>> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 15:45 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
>>> I see many people have expressed their consensus in this, thus I'll
>>> defer the decision to the Board. Thanks to anyone sending a mail about
>>> this conce
2012/10/15 Emmanuele Bassi :
> have we had any indication that being on irc.gnome.org is in any way,
> shape, or form preventing people from contributing to GNOME - and that
> moving to freenode would open the floodgates to new contributors?
Freenode has more than 8 users and I'm pretty much
2012/10/15 Bastien Nocera :
> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 15:45 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
>> I see many people have expressed their consensus in this, thus I'll
>> defer the decision to the Board. Thanks to anyone sending a mail about
>> this concern.
>
> 3 people agreeing with you isn't consensus.
I sa
hi;
On 15 October 2012 10:23, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:14 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:11 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:07 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:33 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 18:48 +0300, Rūdolfs Mazurs wrote:
>> Sv, 2012-10-14 16:49 +0200, Andre Klapper rakstīja:
>> > Would you (developer, translator, doc writer, designer) be a mentor
>> > and provide tasks?
>>
>> I got the impression, that
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 05:34 -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 05:24 -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> >> Would it be possible to include hacking WebKitGTK+ i18n so it produces
> >> a valid POT file for Damned Lies?
> >>
> >> h
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 05:24 -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
>> Would it be possible to include hacking WebKitGTK+ i18n so it produces
>> a valid POT file for Damned Lies?
>>
>> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45321
>>
>> This problem has
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 05:24 -0400, Chris Leonard wrote:
> Would it be possible to include hacking WebKitGTK+ i18n so it produces
> a valid POT file for Damned Lies?
>
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45321
>
> This problem has gone unattended for two years and it makes Epiphany
> (and Su
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Karen Sandler wrote:
> On Sun, October 14, 2012 10:49 am, Andre Klapper wrote:
>> Google will run Google Code-In (GCI) again this year
>> (see [1] below if you don't know what that is).
>>
>> Is the GNOME community interested in participating?
>>
>> Would you (deve
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:14 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:11 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:07 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:33 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
> > > > Might be more interesting to do a survey.
> > >
>
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:11 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:07 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:33 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
> > > Might be more interesting to do a survey.
> >
> > This is the day surveys replace nazis as a way to end Internet
>
On Sun, 2012-10-14 at 15:45 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
> I see many people have expressed their consensus in this, thus I'll
> defer the decision to the Board. Thanks to anyone sending a mail about
> this concern.
3 people agreeing with you isn't consensus.
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 11:07 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:33 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
> > Might be more interesting to do a survey.
>
> This is the day surveys replace nazis as a way to end Internet
> conversations.
I don't see that coming if the survey was limited
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 17:55 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> join #gstreamer, or #freedesktop or #pulseaudio or #nm and check for
> yourself, indeed ALL was an exageration, but it's not hard to figure
> out that a huge majority of us have a freenode network tab on our IRC
> client
That's where all the
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 11:33 -0500, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 18:24 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
> > Yeah, the suffix #gnome-$(channel_name) should help with that and many
> > other large projects are living on Freenode since several years and
> > they are able to administer the r
On Sun, October 14, 2012 10:49 am, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Google will run Google Code-In (GCI) again this year
> (see [1] below if you don't know what that is).
>
> Is the GNOME community interested in participating?
>
> Would you (developer, translator, doc writer, designer) be a mentor and
> prov
Hi!
>> I got the impression, that there will be no translation tasks this
year.
>
> Thanks for the heads-up, you are totally right.
> That's a pity.
I think translation tasks have been to difficult to check in the past and
people abused Google Translate so I can kind of understand that they
remo
41 matches
Mail list logo
