t, but today we’re making it official.
>
>
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> --
> Alexandre Franke
> GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director
> ___
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome
n the GNOME Foundation so they also have a say and even
contribute to gtk+ so gtk+ can continue to serve their needs well,
important for the continuing successes of gtk+ in the free software world?
--
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org
Year 2010 民國99年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是
comparing to the fuil GNOME, I think...
--
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai
Year 2013 民國102年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是勞動與技能
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
___
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
>
>
--
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai
Year 2012 民國101年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是勞動與技能
___
viewpoints of developers on issues like GNOME Shell vs. Unity?
--
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai
Year 2011 民國100年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是勞動與技能
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation
FYI, there is an old site at http://gnome-foundation.org/ which shows
information from about 2001.
Maybe the URL should be auto-forward to the current site.
--
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai
Year 2011 民國100年
自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟
自動的行為力是勞動與技能
ree that the GNOME GUI platform is not exciting application
> developers right now, and that's something we need to fix. And it's not
> an easy problem.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Neary
> GNOME Foundation member
n. I’ll be making a formal report of
> the results in a few weeks.
>
> ___
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
>
>
--
A
It seems that a better idea is to consider the Planet not part of GNOME.
That way GNOME does not have to deal with whatever is in the planet, like
slashdot does not control and is not responsible for the messages by its
posters.
GNOME controls the official web page content. This planet is not par
It seems that a better idea is to consider the Planet not part of GNOME.
That way GNOME does not have to deal with whatever is in the planet, like
slashdot does not control and is not responsible for the messages by its
posters.
GNOME controls the official web page content. This planet is not par
one which fits their agenda the most (not that I feel there is an
> agenda but the possibility leaves doubt on the validity of the results).
>
> --
> John
>
> ___
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list@gn
ed, what color would you paint the
> roof?
>
>
--
Andy Tai, a...@atai.org
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
;
On 11/1/07, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/31/07, Andy Tai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not quiet... you don't join ECMA TC45 to prevent OOXML from becoming a
> > standard.
>
> OOXML is going to be the defacto standard whether we like i
ehdad
> http://behdad.org/
>
> "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
> Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
> -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
>
>
>
--
Andy Tai, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
On 10/31/07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:41 -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
> > What was done is done. For the future...
>
> The idea and board's decision was transcribed in board meeting minutes
> and sent to this least a fe
What was done is done. For the future the board should really consider not
sponsoring anyone to work on the OOXML format (and withdraw existing
involvement on the behalf of the GNOME Foundation), as many people in the
free software/FOSS community are working hard to try to prevent the OOXML
from be
> 100% Pure Slashdot Wisdom: "Source code gives a whole new meaning to
> free software."
>
>
--
Andy Tai, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
foundation-list mailing list
foundation-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
Maybe Jody's involvement can be just his personal activity and totally
separated from, and have nothing to do with, GNOME.
On 10/30/07, Jeff Waugh < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > the GNOME Foundation should make a statement opposing the acceptance of
> > OOXML and explaining the reason for
07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 02:33 -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
> > OK, simply, the stated reason for the extraordinary measure (face to
> > face meeting timing) is not a strong one to justify touching the term
> > limit of th
07, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 02:33 -0700, Andy Tai wrote:
> > OK, simply, the stated reason for the extraordinary measure (face to
> > face meeting timing) is not a strong one to justify touching the term
> > limit of th
input here, if possible -- how do
> you suggest we solve the problem? (Or describe why it's not a problem that
> needs to be solved.)
>
> - Jeff
>
> --
> GNOME.conf.au 2008: Melbourne, Australia
> http://live.gnome.org/Melbourne2008
>
--
Andy Tai, [EMAIL PROTE
OK, simply, the stated reason for the extraordinary measure (face to face
meeting timing) is not a strong one to justify touching the term limit of
the board.
On 8/9/07, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The proposal is about doing something out of the ordinary processes
> defined
> by t
OK, simply, the stated reason for the extraordinary measure (face to face
meeting timing) is not a strong one to justify touching the term limit of
the board.
On 8/9/07, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The proposal is about doing something out of the ordinary processes
> defined
> by
f you want to start a debate on a subject, however, all that seems to
> be necessary is to involve perennial target Richard Gooch." - LWN
> ___
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-l
It's like extending George Bush's term by two years... a rather drastic
thing to do...
(No, I don't mean anyone on the board is like George Bush... sorry if that
offends anyone)
On 8/7/07, Dave Neary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > So here's the proposal: I'd like t
On 11/16/06, Joachim Noreiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Name: Joachim Noreiko
As a board member, I want to work to lower the
barriers to entry that block potential GNOME
contributors. I hope that my work on the website and
documentation will play a part in that, but I also
think more can be don
This is elitism and reflects a club mentality.
--- Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just for the record, also, I'll restate what I said
> earlier- I'm
> voting yes here because, quite simply, there are not
> 11 qualified AND
> motivated candidates every year. There have in most
> years bee
Who are "we"? And what do you mean by "we can trust"?
--- Tristan Van Berkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think we need people who a.) we can trust and b.)
> who have the
> time and energy to consider making radical decisions
> as much as
> conservative ones.
>
> It is also my understand
28 matches
Mail list logo
