Is it legal according to California law that the membership committee can decide the results?
Not sure if there is a way in the Charter to trigger a re-vote in case of dispute. 2009/6/25 john palmieri <[email protected]> > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Dave Neary <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The way forward seems clear to me - the membership committee decides what >> counting method will be used, announces it, and we count the election >> according to that means. There doesn't need to be a crisis here. >> >> > Deciding on the correct method after the elections seems a bit off to me. > A member who voted should know exactly how their vote is going to be counted > before the ballot is cast. If different methods reach different conclusions > then that is a crisis because the membership committee would be free to > choose the one which fits their agenda the most (not that I feel there is an > agenda but the possibility leaves doubt on the validity of the results). > > -- > John > > _______________________________________________ > foundation-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list > > -- Andy Tai, [email protected]
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
